Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 138

1.

Segmental percentage contributions of cervical spine during different motion ranges of flexion and extension.

Wu SK, Kuo LC, Lan HC, Tsai SW, Su FC.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jun;23(4):278-84. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a98d26.

PMID:
20068468
2.

Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?

Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2439-48.

PMID:
17023853
3.

Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.

Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Dooris A, Patwardhan AG.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):E794-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afe4bb.

PMID:
19829242
4.

Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2431-4.

PMID:
12435970
5.

Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.

Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC.

Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):216-21.

PMID:
17321972
6.

Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging.

Muhle C, Wiskirchen J, Weinert D, Falliner A, Wesner F, Brinkmann G, Heller M.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Mar 1;23(5):556-67.

PMID:
9530787
7.

Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.

Anderst WJ, Donaldson WF 3rd, Lee JY, Kang JD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):E533-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318289378d.

8.

Cervical spine segmental vertebral motion in healthy volunteers feigning restriction of neck flexion and extension.

Puglisi F, Strimpakos N, Papathanasiou M, Kapreli E, Bonelli A, Sgambetterra S, Ferrari R.

Int J Legal Med. 2007 Sep;121(5):337-40. Epub 2006 Jul 18.

PMID:
16847699
9.

Kinematic analysis of the relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit of the cervical spine.

Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Zou J, Tow B, Alanay A, Abitbol JJ, Wang JC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):187-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604501. Erratum in: Spine. 2008 Apr 1;33(7):830.

PMID:
18197105
10.

Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.

Hussain M, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9):939-47. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bd419b.

PMID:
20375779
11.

Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.

Ishii T, Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Nakajima Y, Tamura S, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 15;29(24):2826-31.

PMID:
15599286
12.

The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Wu SK, Kuo LC, Lan HC, Tsai SW, Chen CL, Su FC.

Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1435-44. Epub 2007 Apr 27.

13.

Global 3D head-trunk kinematics during cervical spine manipulation at different levels.

Klein P, Broers C, Feipel V, Salvia P, Van Geyt B, Dugailly PM, Rooze M.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Nov;18(9):827-31.

PMID:
14527809
14.

Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.

Daffner SD, Xin J, Taghavi CE, Hymanson HJ, Mudiyam C, Hongyu W, Wang JC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2389-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b20054.

PMID:
19829252
15.

Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.

Chin KR, Auerbach JD, Adams SB Jr, Sodl JF, Riew KD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 15;31(4):430-4.

PMID:
16481953
16.

Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses.

Gavin TM, Carandang G, Havey R, Flanagan P, Ghanayem A, Patwardhan AG.

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):527-37.

17.

The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion.

Ren D, Hu Z, Yuan W.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(7):E410-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001266.

PMID:
26583468
18.

The effect of initial head position on active cervical axial rotation range of motion in two age populations.

Walmsley RP, Kimber P, Culham E.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Nov 1;21(21):2435-42.

PMID:
8923628
19.

Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.

Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1554-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b.

PMID:
19564765
20.

Spine-board transfer techniques and the unstable cervical spine.

Del Rossi G, Horodyski M, Heffernan TP, Powers ME, Siders R, Brunt D, Rechtine GR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):E134-8.

PMID:
15087809

Supplemental Content

Support Center