Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.
2.

Interaction of transcriptional regulators with specific nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces genome.

Koerber RT, Rhee HS, Jiang C, Pugh BF.

Mol Cell. 2009 Sep 24;35(6):889-902. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.011.

3.

Opening windows to the genome.

Whitehouse I, Tsukiyama T.

Cell. 2009 May 1;137(3):400-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.026.

4.

Cbf1p is required for chromatin remodeling at promoter-proximal CACGTG motifs in yeast.

Kent NA, Eibert SM, Mellor J.

J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 25;279(26):27116-23.

5.

Common chromatin architecture, common chromatin remodeling, and common transcription kinetics of Adr1-dependent genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Agricola E, Verdone L, Xella B, Di Mauro E, Caserta M.

Biochemistry. 2004 Jul 13;43(27):8878-84.

PMID:
15236596
6.

Nucleosome remodeling and transcriptional repression are distinct functions of Isw1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Pinskaya M, Nair A, Clynes D, Morillon A, Mellor J.

Mol Cell Biol. 2009 May;29(9):2419-30. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01050-08.

7.

Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators.

Huebert DJ, Kuan PF, Keleş S, Gasch AP.

Mol Cell Biol. 2012 May;32(9):1645-53. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06170-11.

8.
9.

Chromatin remodelers clear nucleosomes from intrinsically unfavorable sites to establish nucleosome-depleted regions at promoters.

Tolkunov D, Zawadzki KA, Singer C, Elfving N, Morozov AV, Broach JR.

Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Jun 15;22(12):2106-18. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-10-0826.

10.

Z curve theory-based analysis of the dynamic nature of nucleosome positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Wu X, Liu H, Liu H, Su J, Lv J, Cui Y, Wang F, Zhang Y.

Gene. 2013 Nov 1;530(1):8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.08.018.

PMID:
23958656
11.

Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: proximal promoter motifs characterize TATA-less promoters.

Erb I, van Nimwegen E.

PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024279.

12.

Tup1 stabilizes promoter nucleosome positioning and occupancy at transcriptionally plastic genes.

Rizzo JM, Mieczkowski PA, Buck MJ.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 1;39(20):8803-19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr557.

13.

The ISWI and CHD1 chromatin remodelling activities influence ADH2 expression and chromatin organization.

Xella B, Goding C, Agricola E, Di Mauro E, Caserta M.

Mol Microbiol. 2006 Mar;59(5):1531-41.

14.

A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization.

Gkikopoulos T, Schofield P, Singh V, Pinskaya M, Mellor J, Smolle M, Workman JL, Barton GJ, Owen-Hughes T.

Science. 2011 Sep 23;333(6050):1758-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1206097.

15.

Ceres: software for the integrated analysis of transcription factor binding sites and nucleosome positions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Morris RT, O'Connor TR, Wyrick JJ.

Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 15;26(2):168-74. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp657.

16.

FACT and the proteasome promote promoter chromatin disassembly and transcriptional initiation.

Ransom M, Williams SK, Dechassa ML, Das C, Linger J, Adkins M, Liu C, Bartholomew B, Tyler JK.

J Biol Chem. 2009 Aug 28;284(35):23461-71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.019562.

17.

Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and directionality of chromatin remodelers.

Yen K, Vinayachandran V, Batta K, Koerber RT, Pugh BF.

Cell. 2012 Jun 22;149(7):1461-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.036.

18.

ISWI and CHD chromatin remodelers bind promoters but act in gene bodies.

Zentner GE, Tsukiyama T, Henikoff S.

PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003317.

19.

Nucleosome recognition and spacing by chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a.

Richmond TJ.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Apr;40(2):347-50. doi: 10.1042/BST20110748. Erratum in: Biochem Soc Trans. 2012 Jun 1;40(3):595.

PMID:
22435810
20.

Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.

Ozonov EA, van Nimwegen E.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003181.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center