Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype.

Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, Rorem E, Cowan J, Craigo SD, Tighiouart H, Wilkins-Haug LE.

Prenat Diagn. 2009 Dec;29(13):1213-7. doi: 10.1002/pd.2367.

2.

Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.

Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, Shih JC, Lin TH, Su YN.

BJOG. 2012 Apr;119(5):614-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

3.

[Applied research of combined G-banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses].

Fu W, Lu J, Xu L, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Zhong Y, Wang Y, Jin Y.

Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;31(6):737-42. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2014.06.012. Chinese.

PMID:
25449078
4.

Prenatal Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Fetuses With Structural Cardiac Anomalies.

Lazier J, Fruitman D, Lauzon J, Bernier F, Argiropoulos B, Chernos J, Caluseriu O, Simrose R, Thomas MA.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Jul;38(7):619-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 May 6.

PMID:
27591345
5.

Copy number imbalances detected with a BAC-based array comparative genomic hybridization platform in congenital diaphragmatic hernia fetuses.

Machado IN, Heinrich JK, Barini R, Peralta CF.

Genet Mol Res. 2011 Feb 15;10(1):261-7. doi: 10.4238/vol10-1gmr1001.

6.

Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.

Lovrecic L, Remec ZI, Volk M, Rudolf G, Writzl K, Peterlin B.

BMC Med Genet. 2016 Nov 15;17(1):81.

7.

From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis.

Lichtenbelt KD, Knoers NV, Schuring-Blom GH.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2011;135(3-4):241-50. doi: 10.1159/000334065. Epub 2011 Nov 12. Review.

PMID:
22086062
8.

Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis in neonates with congenital anomalies: detection of chromosomal imbalances.

Emy Dorfman L, Leite JC, Giugliani R, Riegel M.

J Pediatr (Rio J). 2015 Jan-Feb;91(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Sep 6.

9.

Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.

Cohen K, Tzika A, Wood H, Berri S, Roberts P, Mason G, Sheridan E.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;45(4):394-401. doi: 10.1002/uog.14767.

10.

Non-targeted whole genome 250K SNP array analysis as replacement for karyotyping in fetuses with structural ultrasound anomalies: evaluation of a one-year experience.

Faas BH, Feenstra I, Eggink AJ, Kooper AJ, Pfundt R, van Vugt JM, de Leeuw N.

Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):362-70. doi: 10.1002/pd.2948.

PMID:
22467167
11.

Prenatal detection of a subtle unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by karyotyping, FISH and array comparative genomic hybridization.

Cain CC, Saul DO, Oehler E, Blakemore K, Stetten G.

Fetal Diagn Ther. 2008;24(3):286-90. doi: 10.1159/000158519. Epub 2008 Sep 26.

PMID:
18818501
12.

Microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-based prenatal diagnosis for chromosome abnormalities using cell-free fetal DNA in amniotic fluid.

Miura S, Miura K, Masuzaki H, Miyake N, Yoshiura K, Sosonkina N, Harada N, Shimokawa O, Nakayama D, Yoshimura S, Matsumoto N, Niikawa N, Ishimaru T.

J Hum Genet. 2006;51(5):412-7. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

PMID:
16622586
13.

Prenatal diagnosis: array comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with abnormal sonographic findings.

Vestergaard EM, Christensen R, Petersen OB, Vogel I.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Jul;92(7):762-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12146. Epub 2013 May 9.

PMID:
23590624
14.

Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.

Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, Quarello E, Escalona A, Le Sciellour C, Serazin V, Roume J, Ville Y, de Mazancourt P, Selva J.

Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(2):277-84. doi: 10.1159/000224112. Epub 2009 Jun 11.

PMID:
19521095
15.

A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors.

Brady PD, Delle Chiaie B, Christenhusz G, Dierickx K, Van Den Bogaert K, Menten B, Janssens S, Defoort P, Roets E, Sleurs E, Keymolen K, De Catte L, Deprest J, de Ravel T, Van Esch H, Fryns JP, Devriendt K, Vermeesch JR.

Genet Med. 2014 Jun;16(6):469-76. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.168. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

PMID:
24177055
16.

Application of chromosomal microarray in the evaluation of abnormal prenatal findings.

Yatsenko SA, Davis S, Hendrix NW, Surti U, Emery S, Canavan T, Speer P, Hill L, Clemens M, Rajkovic A.

Clin Genet. 2013 Jul;84(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/cge.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 4.

PMID:
23020214
17.

Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease.

Yan Y, Wu Q, Zhang L, Wang X, Dan S, Deng D, Sun L, Yao L, Ma Y, Wang L.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):404-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.13236.

18.

Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype.

Leung TY, Vogel I, Lau TK, Chong W, Hyett JA, Petersen OB, Choy KW.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;38(3):314-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.8988. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

19.

[Application of SNP array method in prenatal diagnosis].

Becvárová V, Hynek M, Putzová M, Soldátová I, Horácek J, Smetanová D, Kulovaný E, Matousková M, Krutílková V, Hlavová E, Rasková D, Hejtmánková M, Cutka K, Cutka D, Stejskal D, Mihalová R, Trková M.

Ceska Gynekol. 2011 Sep;76(4):261-7. Czech.

PMID:
22026066
20.

Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.

Kan AS, Lau ET, Tang WF, Chan SS, Ding SC, Chan KY, Lee CP, Hui PW, Chung BH, Leung KY, Ma T, Leung WC, Tang MH.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e87988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087988. eCollection 2014.

Supplemental Content

Support Center