Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 473

1.
2.

Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.

Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP, Lowry PS, Bird ET.

Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106.

PMID:
15596177
3.

Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.

Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette JJ, Stultiens GN, Beerlage HP, Arends AJ, Debruyne FM.

Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):31-5.

PMID:
9467473
4.
5.

Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.

Huang CY, Chen SS, Chen LK.

Urol Int. 2009;83(4):410-5. doi: 10.1159/000251180. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

PMID:
19996647
6.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.

Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Khader YS.

Int Braz J Urol. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7.

7.

Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Strohmaier WL, Schubert G, Rosenkranz T, Weigl A.

Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9.

PMID:
10516445
8.
9.

Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martín M, Miján-Ortiz JL, Valle-Díaz F, López-León V, Merino-Salas S, Zuluaga-Gómez A.

BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(8):1144-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08500.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.

10.

A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.

Salem HK.

Urology. 2009 Dec;74(6):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076. Epub 2009 Oct 7.

PMID:
19815264
11.
12.
13.

Symptomatic small non-obstructing lower ureteric calculi: comparison of ureteroscopy and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Andankar MG, Maheshwari PN, Saple AL, Mehta V, Varshney A, Bansal B.

J Postgrad Med. 2001 Jul-Sep;47(3):177-80.

14.

Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.

Youssef RF, El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, El-Tabey NA, El-Hefnawy AS, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA, Sheir KZ.

Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

PMID:
19362338
15.

Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.

Stewart GD, Bariol SV, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA.

Int J Clin Pract. 2007 May;61(5):784-8. Epub 2007 Mar 26.

PMID:
17386062
16.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Verze P, Imbimbo C, Cancelmo G, Creta M, Palmieri A, Mangiapia F, Buonopane R, Mirone V.

BJU Int. 2010 Dec;106(11):1748-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09338.x.

17.

[Influence of lithotripsy modalities on complication rate].

Radulović S, Milenković-Petronić D, Vuksanović A, Vavić B.

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2009 May-Jun;137(5-6):259-65. Serbian.

18.

Retrograde ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stone removal in children.

De Dominicis M, Matarazzo E, Capozza N, Collura G, Caione P.

BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):1049-52.

19.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.

Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX, Nabi G.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD006029.

PMID:
22161396
20.

Treatment of lower ureteric stones by ESWL and ICPL: a comparative study.

Islam MS, Shameem IA, Alam AK, Kibria SA.

Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2005 Dec;31(3):104-9.

PMID:
17549871

Supplemental Content

Support Center