Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 1271

1.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
2.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.

PMID:
17205029
3.

Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.

Collier A, Heilig L, Schilling L, Williams H, Dellavalle RP.

Br J Dermatol. 2006 Dec;155(6):1230-5.

PMID:
17107394
4.

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.

Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
19282144
5.

Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.

Shea B, Bouter LM, Grimshaw JM, Francis D, Ortiz Z, Wells GA, Tugwell PS, Boers M.

J Rheumatol. 2006 Jan;33(1):9-15. Epub 2005 Nov 1.

PMID:
16267878
6.

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews.

Al Faleh K, Al-Omran M.

BMC Pediatr. 2009 Jun 17;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-38.

7.

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.

MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):648-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.127. Epub 2010 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
20639030
9.

Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.

van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):838-844.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128939
10.

Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.

Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26.

PMID:
11679863
11.

Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature.

Rudmik LR, Walen SG, Dixon E, Dort J.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;139(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.03.020. Review.

PMID:
18656713
12.

A review of methodological quality of systematic reviews on multiple pregnancies.

Jayaram PM, Khan KS.

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Nov;26(8):731-5. Review.

PMID:
17130017
13.

State of the evidence on acute asthma management in children: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

Boluyt N, van der Lee JH, Moyer VA, Brand PL, Offringa M.

Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1334-43. Review.

PMID:
18055684
14.

Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.

Piehl JH, Green S, McDonald S.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan 17;3(1):2. Epub 2003 Jan 17.

16.

[Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].

Grootens KP, Assendelft WJ, Overbeke AJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Nov 8;147(45):2226-30. Dutch.

PMID:
14640061
17.

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Shea B, Boers M, Grimshaw JM, Hamel C, Bouter LM.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 13;6:27.

18.

An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.

de Craen AJ, van Vliet HA, Helmerhorst FM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):311-3.

PMID:
15718121
19.

Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews.

de Bot CM, Moed H, Berger MY, Röder E, van Wijk RG, van der Wouden JC.

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Sep;22(6):548-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01165.x. Review.

PMID:
21919934
20.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center