Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 59

1.

How do amplitude spectra influence rapid animal detection?

Gaspar CM, Rousselet GA.

Vision Res. 2009 Dec;49(24):3001-12. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.021. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

2.

The electrophysiological correlate of saliency: evidence from a figure-detection task.

Straube S, Fahle M.

Brain Res. 2010 Jan 11;1307:89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.043. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

PMID:
19854163
3.

The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition.

Loschky LC, Sethi A, Simons DJ, Pydimarri TN, Ochs D, Corbeille JL.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1431-50.

PMID:
18085955
4.

Generating customised experimental stimuli for visual search using Genetic Algorithms shows evidence for a continuum of search efficiency.

Verma M, McOwan PW.

Vision Res. 2009 Feb;49(3):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.11.006. Epub 2008 Dec 23.

5.

Animal detection in natural scenes: critical features revisited.

Wichmann FA, Drewes J, Rosas P, Gegenfurtner KR.

J Vis. 2010 Apr 15;10(4):6.1-27. doi: 10.1167/10.4.6.

PMID:
20465326
6.

Dynamics of the influence of segmentation cues on orientation perception.

Durant S, Clifford CW.

Vision Res. 2006 Sep;46(18):2934-40. Epub 2006 May 16.

7.

Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.

Nagy AL, Neriani KE, Young TL.

Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(14):1885-99.

8.

Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.

Chen Z.

Vision Res. 2009 May;49(11):1481-91. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

9.

Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes.

Hollingworth A.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):388-403.

PMID:
12760623
10.

Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.

Lamy D, Zoaris L.

Vision Res. 2009 May;49(11):1472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

11.

A new cue to figure-ground coding: top-bottom polarity.

Hulleman J, Humphreys GW.

Vision Res. 2004 Nov;44(24):2779-91.

12.

The influence of orientation jitter and motion on contour saliency and object identification.

Nygård GE, Looy TV, Wagemans J.

Vision Res. 2009 Oct;49(20):2475-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

13.

Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: re-exploration of spatial scale influence.

Goffaux V.

Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(7):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Feb 21.

14.

Brain computer interface using flash onset and offset visual evoked potentials.

Lee PL, Hsieh JC, Wu CH, Shyu KK, Wu YT.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;119(3):605-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.013.

PMID:
18164655
15.

Detection of (anti)symmetry and (anti)repetition: perceptual mechanisms versus cognitive strategies.

van der Helm PA, Treder MS.

Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(23):2754-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

16.

Contour interpolation revealed by a dot localization paradigm.

Guttman SE, Kellman PJ.

Vision Res. 2004;44(15):1799-815.

17.

The role of gist in scene recognition.

Sampanes AC, Tseng P, Bridgeman B.

Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

18.

Visual search for a target against a 1/f(beta) continuous textured background.

Clarke AD, Green PR, Chantler MJ, Emrith K.

Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

19.

Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.

Lamy D, Antebi C, Aviani N, Carmel T.

Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(1):30-41. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

20.

The recognition of partially visible natural objects in the presence and absence of their occluders.

Johnson JS, Olshausen BA.

Vision Res. 2005 Nov;45(25-26):3262-76. Epub 2005 Jul 25.

Supplemental Content

Support Center