Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 380

1.

Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception.

Cheyne HA, Kalgaonkar K, Clements M, Zurek P.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Oct;126(4):2052-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3205400.

PMID:
19813814
2.

The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.

Brungart DS, Scott KR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jul;110(1):425-40.

PMID:
11508968
3.

Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.

Pelegrín-García D, Smits B, Brunskog J, Jeong CH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):1981-90. doi: 10.1121/1.3552881.

PMID:
21476654
4.

Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.

Allen JS, Miller JL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jun;115(6):3171-83.

PMID:
15237841
5.

On the perception of similarity among talkers.

Remez RE, Fellowes JM, Nagel DS.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3688-96. doi: 10.1121/1.2799903.

PMID:
18247776
6.

Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels.

Liénard JS, Di Benedetto MG.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jul;106(1):411-22.

PMID:
10420631
7.
8.

Are changes in pitch and formants enough to influence talker normalization processes in children and adults?

Kishon-Rabin L, Taitelbaum-Swead R, Salomon R, Slutzkin M, Amir N.

J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;20(3):219-32.

PMID:
19852309
9.

Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.

Maniwa K, Jongman A, Wade T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):1114-25. doi: 10.1121/1.2821966.

PMID:
18247912
10.

Perceptual consequences of changes in vocoded speech parameters in various reverberation conditions.

Drgas S, Blaszak MA.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Aug;52(4):945-55. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0068). Epub 2009 Apr 20.

PMID:
19380609
11.

Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre.

Fellowes JM, Remez RE, Rubin PE.

Percept Psychophys. 1997 Aug;59(6):839-49.

PMID:
9270359
12.

Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.

Harnsberger JD, Shrivastav R, Brown WS Jr, Rothman H, Hollien H.

J Voice. 2008 Jan;22(1):58-69. Epub 2006 Sep 11.

PMID:
16968663
13.

Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.

Magnuson JS, Nusbaum HC.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):391-409.

PMID:
17469975
14.

The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.

Newman RS, Clouse SA, Burnham JL.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Mar;109(3):1181-96.

PMID:
11303932
15.
16.

Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers.

Newman RS.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 May;71(4):822-36. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.822.

PMID:
19429961
17.

Multidimensional analysis of male and female voices.

Murry T, Singh S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Nov;68(5):1294-300.

PMID:
7440851
18.

Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.

Brungart DS, Simpson BD.

Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):79-91.

PMID:
17515218
19.

Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress.

Sluijter AM, van Heuven VJ.

J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Oct;100(4 Pt 1):2471-85.

PMID:
8865652
20.

The accuracy of absolute localization judgments for speech stimuli.

Gilkey RH, Anderson TR.

J Vestib Res. 1995 Nov-Dec;5(6):487-97.

PMID:
8589858

Supplemental Content

Support Center