Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 10570

2.
3.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):73-108. Review.

4.
6.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

7.
8.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
9.

[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].

Schnabel A, Kranke P.

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21. Review. German.

PMID:
20665362
10.

Evidence-based interventional pain management: principles, problems, potential and applications.

Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Giordano J.

Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):329-56. Review.

11.

An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Helm S 2nd, Schultz DM, Datta S, Hirsch JA; American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians.

Pain Physician. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(4):E1-33.

12.

Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.

PMID:
15026264
13.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

14.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.

Manchikanti L, Derby R, Wolfer L, Singh V, Datta S, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40. Review.

15.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
16.

Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.

Kranke P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):763-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a560a.

PMID:
20523217
17.

Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L204. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

PMID:
18728102
18.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Minor KS, Turina M, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2006 Nov;93(11):1315-24. Review.

PMID:
17058324
19.

[Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM Statement].

Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF.

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2000 Mar-Apr;74(2):107-18. Spanish.

20.

Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Yuan Y, Hunt RH.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1086-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.118. Review.

PMID:
19417748

Supplemental Content

Support Center