Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Kohn GP, Galanko JA, Meyers MO, Feins RH, Farrell TM.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Nov;13(11):1900-10; discussion 1910-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1008-2. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

PMID:
19760305
2.

The effect of surgical volume and the provision of residency and fellowship training on complications of major hepatic resection.

Kohn GP, Nikfarjam M.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Dec;14(12):1981-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1310-z. Epub 2010 Sep 8.

PMID:
20824384
3.

A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.

Jafari MD, Halabi WJ, Smith BR, Nguyen VQ, Phelan MJ, Stamos MJ, Nguyen NT.

Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b11d.

PMID:
24022437
4.
5.

Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.

Munasinghe A, Markar SR, Mamidanna R, Darzi AW, Faiz OD, Hanna GB, Low DE.

Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):79-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000805.

PMID:
24979602
6.

Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, Chang DC, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Bouvet M, Horgan S.

Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2491-2497. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5251-9. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

PMID:
27660245
7.

Doubling of 30-Day Mortality by 90 Days After Esophagectomy: A Critical Measure of Outcomes for Quality Improvement.

In H, Palis BE, Merkow RP, Posner MC, Ferguson MK, Winchester DP, Pezzi CM.

Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):286-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001215.

PMID:
25915912
8.

Improving outcomes after esophagectomy: the impact of operative volume.

Casson AG, van Lanschot JJ.

J Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;92(3):262-6. Review.

PMID:
16299792
9.

Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.

Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P.

Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):292-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dd4e8c.

PMID:
20622666
10.

Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.

Joseph B, Morton JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, Rubinfeld I, Faraj C, Velanovich V.

J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.019.

PMID:
19476785
11.

Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center.

Courrech Staal EF, van Coevorden F, Cats A, Aleman BM, van Velthuysen ML, Boot H, Peeters MJ, van Sandick JW.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3219-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0700-5. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

PMID:
19777184
12.

Incidence and risk factors for respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy: a NSQIP analysis.

Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, Lidor AO.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Winter;26(4):287-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

PMID:
25837540
13.

Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.

Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Low DE.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 May;16(5):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1731-3. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
22089950
14.

Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.

Gopaldas RR, Bhamidipati CM, Dao TK, Markley JG.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;95(3):1064-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.038. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

PMID:
23261119
15.

Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy.

Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, Chang DC, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Bouvet M, Horgan S.

Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12451.

PMID:
26727414
16.

Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.

Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB.

Ann Surg. 2012 Feb;255(2):197-203. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e39fa.

PMID:
22173202
17.

High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.

Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE, Blaauwgeers HG, Stassen LP, Steup WH, Tilanus HW, Tollenaar RA.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):80-7. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

18.

Postoperative mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: development of a preoperative risk prediction model.

Ra J, Paulson EC, Kucharczuk J, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Rapaport-Kelz R, Kaiser LR, Spitz FR.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1577-84. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9867-4. Epub 2008 Apr 1. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):228.

PMID:
18379852
19.

Comorbidities and Risk of Complications After Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden.

Backemar L, Lagergren P, Djärv T, Johar A, Wikman A, Lagergren J.

World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2282-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3093-6.

PMID:
25952691
20.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for Evaluating Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database Task Force.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 May;103(5):1661-1667. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.027. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

PMID:
28385375

Supplemental Content

Support Center