Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors.

Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Aiello Bowles EJ, Cutter GR, Carney PA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):441-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

2.

Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp105. Epub 2009 May 26.

3.

Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.

Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

4.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

5.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.

Lehman CD, Wellman RD, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Tosteson AN, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231.

6.

Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Carney PA, D'Orsi C, Elmore JG, Barlow WE; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 3;103(15):1152-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr206. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

7.

Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 19;99(24):1854-63. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

8.

Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.

PMID:
15741572
9.

Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Geller B, Dittus K, Braithwaite D, Wernli KJ, Miglioretti DL, O'Meara ES; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.

10.

Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.

Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):456-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13672.

11.

Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.

Tan A, Freeman DH Jr, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Dec;100(3):309-18. Epub 2006 Jul 4.

PMID:
16819566
12.

Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.

Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Anderson ML, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Brenner RJ; National Cancer Institute-sponsored Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):74-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091881. Epub 2010 May 26.

13.

Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.

Taplin SH, Abraham L, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Buist DS, Smith-Bindman R, Lehman C, Weaver D, Carney PA, Barlow WE.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1040-51. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq233. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

14.

Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn172. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

15.

Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

Haneuse S, Buist DS, Miglioretti DL, Anderson ML, Carney PA, Onega T, Geller BM, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Smith RA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):69-79. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111026. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

16.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, Sickles EA, Smith RA, Carney PA, Taplin SH, Rosenberg RD, Geller BM, Onega TL, Monsees BS, Bassett LW, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):72-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101698. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

17.

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Cutter GR, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Abraham LA, Fosse JS, Carney PA.

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46.

18.

Mammographic screening interval in relation to tumor characteristics and false-positive risk by race/ethnicity and age.

O'Meara ES, Zhu W, Hubbard RA, Braithwaite D, Kerlikowske K, Dittus KL, Geller B, Wernli KJ, Miglioretti DL.

Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3959-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28310. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

19.

Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.

Torres-Mejía G, Smith RA, Carranza-Flores Mde L, Bogart A, Martínez-Matsushita L, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, Ortega-Olvera C, Montemayor-Varela E, Angeles-Llerenas A, Bautista-Arredondo S, Sánchez-González G, Martínez-Montañez OG, Uscanga-Sánchez SR, Lazcano-Ponce E, Hernández-Ávila M.

BMC Cancer. 2015 May 16;15:410. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1399-2.

20.

Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.

Geller BM, Bowles EJ, Sohng HY, Brenner RJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):361-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1647.

Supplemental Content

Support Center