Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 300

1.

Age effects in temporal envelope processing: speech unmasking and auditory steady state responses.

Grose JH, Mamo SK, Hall JW 3rd.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):568-75. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac128f.

2.

Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.

Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):340-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823fa4c3.

3.

Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr;113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.

PMID:
12703719
4.
5.

Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.

Sheft S, Shafiro V, Lorenzi C, McMullen R, Farrell C.

Ear Hear. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):709-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825aab15.

6.

Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.

Schvartz KC, Chatterjee M.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):411-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823d78dc.

7.

Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):274-92. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.4.4.

PMID:
23636209
8.

Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.

Phatak SA, Grant KW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1646-54. doi: 10.1121/1.4742718.

PMID:
22978893
9.

Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

Grose JH, Mamo SK.

Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):755-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e627e7.

10.

Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.

Maki A, Kawase T, Kobayashi T.

Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):584-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb57.

PMID:
19550336
11.

Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Purcell DW, John SM, Schneider BA, Picton TW.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Dec;116(6):3581-93.

PMID:
15658709
12.

Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.

Jenstad LM, Souza PE.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1123-38.

PMID:
17905900
13.
14.

Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Oct;120(4):2295-311.

PMID:
17069325
15.
16.

Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.

Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN.

Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.

PMID:
22343546
17.

Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.

Wilson RH, McArdle R, Betancourt MB, Herring K, Lipton T, Chisolm TH.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):90-109.

PMID:
20166311
18.

Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.

Leigh-Paffenroth ED, Elangovan S.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):393-404. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.2.

PMID:
21993047
19.

Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.

F├╝llgrabe C, Berthommier F, Lorenzi C.

Hear Res. 2006 Jan;211(1-2):74-84. Epub 2005 Nov 8.

PMID:
16289579
20.

Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun;137(6):3487-501. doi: 10.1121/1.4921603.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk