Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 370

1.

Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?

Adams AL, Chhieng DC, Bell WC, Winokur T, Hameed O.

Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009 Aug;13(4):223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 May 9.

PMID:
19608079
2.
3.

Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.

Scholten AN, Smit VT, Beerman H, van Putten WL, Creutzberg CL.

Cancer. 2004 Feb 15;100(4):764-72.

4.

Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.

Lang H, Lindner V, de Fromont M, MoliniƩ V, Letourneux H, Meyer N, Martin M, Jacqmin D.

Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):625-9.

5.

A newly proposed semi-automated method of grading invasive lobular carcinoma: a unifying concept and correlation with prognostic markers and patient survival.

Stevens E, Kimler BF, Davis MK, Fan F, Thomas P, Wang XY, Damjanov I, Tawfik OW.

Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2009 Winter;39(1):25-31.

PMID:
19201737
6.

Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma.

Frierson HF Jr, Wolber RA, Berean KW, Franquemont DW, Gaffey MJ, Boyd JC, Wilbur DC.

Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Feb;103(2):195-8.

PMID:
7856562
7.

Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.

Sikka M, Agarwal S, Bhatia A.

Indian J Cancer. 1999 Jun-Dec;36(2-4):149-53.

PMID:
10921219
8.

Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.

Meyer JS, Alvarez C, Milikowski C, Olson N, Russo I, Russo J, Glass A, Zehnbauer BA, Lister K, Parwaresch R; Cooperative Breast Cancer Tissue Resource.

Mod Pathol. 2005 Aug;18(8):1067-78. Erratum in: Mod Pathol. 2005 Dec;18(12):1649.

9.

Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma.

Malpica A, Deavers MT, Tornos C, Kurman RJ, Soslow R, Seidman JD, Munsell MF, Gaertner E, Frishberg D, Silva EG.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Aug;31(8):1168-74.

PMID:
17667538
10.

Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Sneige N, Lagios MD, Schwarting R, Colburn W, Atkinson E, Weber D, Sahin A, Kemp B, Hoque A, Risin S, Sabichi A, Boone C, Dhingra K, Kelloff G, Lippman S.

Hum Pathol. 1999 Mar;30(3):257-62.

PMID:
10088542
11.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 80 patients with special reference to histological grading.

Brandwein MS, Ivanov K, Wallace DI, Hille JJ, Wang B, Fahmy A, Bodian C, Urken ML, Gnepp DR, Huvos A, Lumerman H, Mills SE.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Jul;25(7):835-45.

PMID:
11420454
12.

Simplified nuclear grading of fine-needle aspirates of breast carcinoma: concordance with corresponding histologic nuclear grading and flow cytometric data.

Cajulis RS, Hessel RG, Hwang S, Haines K, Frias-Hidvegi D, O'Gorman M.

Diagn Cytopathol. 1994;11(2):124-30.

PMID:
7813359
13.

Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.

Bektas S, Bahadir B, Kandemir NO, Barut F, Gul AE, Ozdamar SO.

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Nov;25(11):596-600. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70562-5.

14.

Histologic grading is an independent prognostic factor in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Menon S, Green AR, Lee AH, Ellis IO.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Sep;111(1):121-7. Epub 2007 Oct 11.

PMID:
17929165
15.

Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement.

Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N, Dawkins H, Harvey J, Sterrett G, Ellis I, Elston C.

Hum Pathol. 1995 Aug;26(8):873-9.

PMID:
7635449
16.

Description of a novel system for grading of endometrial carcinoma and comparison with existing grading systems.

Alkushi A, Abdul-Rahman ZH, Lim P, Schulzer M, Coldman A, Kalloger SE, Miller D, Gilks CB.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Mar;29(3):295-304.

PMID:
15725797
17.

Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.

Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Maffei N, Brunelli M, Novara G, Zanolla L, Pea M, Artibani W.

Cancer. 2005 Jan 1;103(1):68-75.

18.

[Subtyping and prognostic assessment of invasive lobular breast carcinoma].

Sinn HP, Kellerhoff NM, Kellerhoff R, Bastert G, Otto HF.

Pathologe. 1997 Jan;18(1):37-44. German.

PMID:
9157403
19.

Correlation between nuclear grade and biological prognostic variables in invasive breast cancer.

Yang Q, Mori I, Sakurai T, Yoshimura G, Suzuma T, Nakamura Y, Nakamura M, Taniguchi E, Tamaki T, Umemura T, Kakudo K.

Breast Cancer. 2001;8(2):105-10.

PMID:
11342982
20.

Fine needle aspiration cytology of lobular breast carcinoma. Comparison with other breast lesions.

Rajesh L, Dey P, Joshi K.

Acta Cytol. 2003 Mar-Apr;47(2):177-82.

PMID:
12685185

Supplemental Content

Support Center