Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 138

1.

Clinical and functional outcomes of laminoplasty and laminectomy.

Hardman J, Graf O, Kouloumberis PE, Gao WH, Chan M, Roitberg BZ.

Neurol Res. 2010 May;32(4):416-20. doi: 10.1179/174313209X459084. Epub 2009 Jul 8.

PMID:
19589202
2.

Decompressive laminoplasty in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bilateral cutting versus open-door technique.

Asgari S, Bassiouni H, Massoud N, Schlamann M, Stolke D, Sandalcioglu IE.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Jul;151(7):739-49; discussion 749. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0343-0. Epub 2009 May 13.

PMID:
19436951
3.

A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Otani K, Sato K, Yabuki S, Iwabuchi M, Kikuchi S.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 1;34(3):268-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195b27a.

PMID:
19179921
4.

Skip laminectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Sivaraman A, Bhadra AK, Altaf F, Singh A, Rai A, Casey AT, Crawford RJ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):96-100. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318198c92a.

PMID:
20084024
5.

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes.

Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, Chou D, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Nov;27(5):508-517. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.SPINE16831. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

PMID:
28862572
6.

[Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy].

Zhang H, Sun T, Lu S, Li Q, Yadav SK.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(10):1191-6. Chinese.

PMID:
23167101
8.

Laminoplasty and laminectomy hybrid decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with hypertrophic ligamentum flavum: a retrospective study.

Ding H, Xue Y, Tang Y, He D, Li Z, Zhao Y, Zong Y, Wang Y, Wang P.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e95482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095482. eCollection 2014.

9.

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, Donaldson W 3rd, Kang J.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):688-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1653-5.

10.

Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.

Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW Jr, Rodts GE Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):619-25. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10206.

PMID:
21388285
11.

ACDF with the PCB cage-plate system versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Liu T, Yang HL, Xu YZ, Qi RF, Guan HQ.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jun;24(4):213-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181e9f294.

PMID:
20736851
12.

Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Yoon ST, Hashimoto RE, Raich A, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Riew KD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb7c. Review.

PMID:
23963000
13.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis or sagittal sigmoid alignment: outcome after anterior or posterior decompression.

Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Mwaka ES, Kobayashi S, Baba H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Nov;11(5):521-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08385.

PMID:
19929353
14.

Effect of different surgical methods on headache associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy.

Sun Y, Muheremu A, Yan K, Yu J, Zheng S, Tian W.

BMC Surg. 2015 Sep 23;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0092-3.

15.

Presence of anterior compression of the spinal cord after laminoplasty inhibits upper extremity motor recovery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Hirai T, Kawabata S, Enomoto M, Kato T, Tomizawa S, Sakai K, Yoshii T, Sakaki K, Shinomiya K, Okawa A.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):377-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821fd396.

PMID:
21540767
16.

Comparison of enlargement of the spinal canal after cervical laminoplasty: open-door type and double-door type.

Hirabayashi S, Yamada H, Motosuneya T, Watanabe Y, Miura M, Sakai H, Matsushita T.

Eur Spine J. 2010 Oct;19(10):1690-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1369-y. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

17.

Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis.

Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1168-75.

PMID:
12045513
18.

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis.

Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, Rodts GE.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jun 15;26(12):1330-6.

PMID:
11426147
19.

Selective laminoplasty after the preoperative diagnosis of the responsible level using spinal cord evoked potentials in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary report.

Kato Y, Kojima T, Kataoka H, Imajo Y, Yara T, Yoshida Y, Imagama T, Taguchi T.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):586-92. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929ca2.

PMID:
19956033
20.

Modified double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical outcome in 520 patients and technique description.

Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 May;26(3):135-40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823d848b.

PMID:
22105107

Supplemental Content

Support Center