Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 348

1.

Nobility in objectivity: A prosecutor's case for neutrality in forensic nursing.

Canaff R.

J Forensic Nurs. 2009;5(2):89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01039.x.

PMID:
19538653
2.

Impact of sexual assault nurse examiners on the evaluation of sexual assault in a pediatric emergency department.

Bechtel K, Ryan E, Gallagher D.

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jul;24(7):442-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31817de11d.

PMID:
18580706
3.

Attitudes of adult/adolescent sexual assault nurse examiners and caring for younger patients.

Marchetti CA, Fantasia HC, Molchan L.

J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;40(1):39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

PMID:
23199787
4.

Original research: Giving sexual assault survivors time to decide: an exploration of the use and effects of the nonreport option.

Heffron LC, Busch-Armendariz NB, Vohra SS, Johnson RJ, Camp V.

Am J Nurs. 2014 Mar;114(3):26-35; quiz 36, 49. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444489.49091.10.

PMID:
24518047
5.

Defining the boundaries: how sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) balance patient care and law enforcement collaboration.

Campbell R, Greeson M, Patterson D.

J Forensic Nurs. 2011 Mar;7(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01091.x.

PMID:
21348930
6.

Mock juror perception of sexual assault nurse examiner testimony.

Wasarhaley NE, Simcic TA, Golding JM.

Violence Vict. 2012;27(4):500-11.

PMID:
22978071
7.

[The introduction and inspiration to a sexual assault nurse examiner in forensic nursing].

Lou CF, Lee S.

Hu Li Za Zhi. 2005 Dec;52(6):57-62. Chinese.

PMID:
16432797
8.
9.

Avoiding ipse dixit mislabeling: post-Daubert approaches to expert clinical opinions.

Gutheil TG, Bursztajn H.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(2):205-10.

PMID:
12875499
10.

The perception of role conflict in sexual assault nursing and its effects on care delivery.

Downing NR, Mackin ML.

J Forensic Nurs. 2012 Jun;8(2):53-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2012.01135.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

PMID:
22621663
11.

The comprehensive sexual assault assessment tool.

Burgess AW, Fawcett J.

Nurse Pract. 1996 Apr;21(4):66, 71-6, 78 passim.

PMID:
8801493
12.

Sexual assault nurse examiners' perceptions of funding challenges faced by SANE programs: "it stinks".

Maier SL.

J Forensic Nurs. 2012 Jun;8(2):81-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01126.x. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

PMID:
22621666
13.

The Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner's Interactions Within the Sexual Assault Response Team: A Systematic Review.

Adams P, Hulton L.

Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Jul-Sep;38(3):213-27. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000112. Review.

PMID:
27482993
14.

Forensic nursing - Global scenario and Indian perspective.

Dash SK, Patel S, Chavali K.

J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Aug;42:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 30. Review.

PMID:
27314972
15.

TX: sexual assault nurse expert (SANE) testifies: SANE's testimony in criminal case held admissible.

[No authors listed]

Nurs Law Regan Rep. 2000 Dec;41(7):3. No abstract available.

PMID:
11995073
16.

Now We Know: Assessing Sexual Assault Criminal Justice Case Processing in an Urban Community Using the Sexual Assault Nurse Practitioner Evaluation Toolkit.

Valentine JL, Shaw J, Lark A, Campbell R.

J Forensic Nurs. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):133-40. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000115.

PMID:
27496646
17.

The hired gun expert witness.

Beck M.

Mo Med. 1994 Apr;91(4):179-82.

PMID:
8202069
18.

US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.

Flanagan D.

J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(2):97-8.

PMID:
12498453
19.

The emergency department and victims of sexual violence: an assessment of preparedness to help.

Plichta SB, Vandecar-Burdin T, Odor RK, Reams S, Zhang Y.

J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2006 Winter;29(3):285-308.

PMID:
17571470
20.

False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.

Watson C, Weiss KJ, Pouncey C.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(2):174-86.

PMID:
20542936

Supplemental Content

Support Center