Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Using the optimal robust receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predictive genetic tests.

Lu Q, Obuchowski N, Won S, Zhu X, Elston RC.

Biometrics. 2010 Jun;66(2):586-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01278.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.

2.

Bagging optimal ROC curve method for predictive genetic tests, with an application for rheumatoid arthritis.

Lu Q, Cui Y, Ye C, Wei C, Elston RC.

J Biopharm Stat. 2010 Mar;20(2):401-14. doi: 10.1080/10543400903572811.

3.
4.

Use of support vector machines for disease risk prediction in genome-wide association studies: concerns and opportunities.

Mittag F, Büchel F, Saad M, Jahn A, Schulte C, Bochdanovits Z, Simón-Sánchez J, Nalls MA, Keller M, Hernandez DG, Gibbs JR, Lesage S, Brice A, Heutink P, Martinez M, Wood NW, Hardy J, Singleton AB, Zell A, Gasser T, Sharma M; International Parkinson’s Disease Genomics Consortium..

Hum Mutat. 2012 Dec;33(12):1708-18. doi: 10.1002/humu.22161. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

PMID:
22777693
5.

A non-parametric method for building predictive genetic tests on high-dimensional data.

Ye C, Cui Y, Wei C, Elston RC, Zhu J, Lu Q.

Hum Hered. 2011;71(3):161-70. doi: 10.1159/000327299. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

6.

Interpretation of genetic association studies: markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers.

Jakobsdottir J, Gorin MB, Conley YP, Ferrell RE, Weeks DE.

PLoS Genet. 2009 Feb;5(2):e1000337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000337. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

7.

Analysis of 32 common susceptibility genetic variants and their combined effect in predicting risk of Type 2 diabetes and related traits in Indians.

Janipalli CS, Kumar MV, Vinay DG, Sandeep MN, Bhaskar S, Kulkarni SR, Aruna M, Joglekar CV, Priyadharshini S, Maheshwari N, Yajnik CS, Chandak GR.

Diabet Med. 2012 Jan;29(1):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03438.x.

PMID:
21913964
8.

Prediction of lung cancer risk in a Chinese population using a multifactorial genetic model.

Li H, Yang L, Zhao X, Wang J, Qian J, Chen H, Fan W, Liu H, Jin L, Wang W, Lu D.

BMC Med Genet. 2012 Dec 10;13:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-118.

9.

Pathway analysis of GWAS provides new insights into genetic susceptibility to 3 inflammatory diseases.

Eleftherohorinou H, Wright V, Hoggart C, Hartikainen AL, Jarvelin MR, Balding D, Coin L, Levin M.

PLoS One. 2009 Nov 30;4(11):e8068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008068.

10.

Genetic and clinical risk prediction model for postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Kolek MJ, Muehlschlegel JD, Bush WS, Parvez B, Murray KT, Stein CM, Shoemaker MB, Blair MA, Kor KC, Roden DM, Donahue BS, Fox AA, Shernan SK, Collard CD, Body SC, Darbar D.

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):25-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002300. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

11.

A comparison of genomic profiles of complex diseases under different models.

Potenciano V, Abad-Grau MM, Alcina A, Matesanz F.

BMC Med Genomics. 2016 Jan 19;9:3. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0157-2.

12.

[Genome-wide association study based risk prediction model in predicting lung cancer risk in Chinese].

Zhu M, Cheng Y, Dai J, Xie L, Jin G, Ma H, Hu Z, Shi Y, Lin D, Shen H.

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;36(10):1047-52. Chinese.

PMID:
26837341
13.

Strategies for developing prediction models from genome-wide association studies.

Wu J, Pfeiffer RM, Gail MH.

Genet Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;37(8):768-77. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21762. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

PMID:
24166696
14.

Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Wacholder S, Hartge P, Prentice R, Garcia-Closas M, Feigelson HS, Diver WR, Thun MJ, Cox DG, Hankinson SE, Kraft P, Rosner B, Berg CD, Brinton LA, Lissowska J, Sherman ME, Chlebowski R, Kooperberg C, Jackson RD, Buckman DW, Hui P, Pfeiffer R, Jacobs KB, Thomas GD, Hoover RN, Gail MH, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ.

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18;362(11):986-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907727. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 2;363(23):2272.

15.

Feature ranking of type 1 diabetes susceptibility genes improves prediction of type 1 diabetes.

Winkler C, Krumsiek J, Buettner F, Angermüller C, Giannopoulou EZ, Theis FJ, Ziegler AG, Bonifacio E.

Diabetologia. 2014 Dec;57(12):2521-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3362-1. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Erratum in: Diabetologia. 2015 Jan;58(1):206.

PMID:
25186292
16.

A genetic risk score combining 32 SNPs is associated with body mass index and improves obesity prediction in people with major depressive disorder.

Hung CF, Breen G, Czamara D, Corre T, Wolf C, Kloiber S, Bergmann S, Craddock N, Gill M, Holsboer F, Jones L, Jones I, Korszun A, Kutalik Z, Lucae S, Maier W, Mors O, Owen MJ, Rice J, Rietschel M, Uher R, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Craig IW, Farmer AE, Lewis CM, Müller-Myhsok B, Preisig M, McGuffin P, Rivera M.

BMC Med. 2015 Apr 17;13:86. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0334-3.

17.

A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches to incorporating external information for the prediction of prostate cancer risk.

Newcombe PJ, Reck BH, Sun J, Platek GT, Verzilli C, Kader AK, Kim ST, Hsu FC, Zhang Z, Zheng SL, Mooser VE, Condreay LD, Spraggs CF, Whittaker JC, Rittmaster RS, Xu J.

Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;36(1):71-83. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21600.

18.

1000 Genomes-based imputation identifies novel and refined associations for the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium phase 1 Data.

Huang J, Ellinghaus D, Franke A, Howie B, Li Y.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Jul;20(7):801-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.3. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

19.

Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus with genetic risk models on the basis of established genome-wide association markers: a systematic review.

Bao W, Hu FB, Rong S, Rong Y, Bowers K, Schisterman EF, Liu L, Zhang C.

Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct 15;178(8):1197-207. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt123. Epub 2013 Sep 5. Review.

20.

The value of genetic information for diabetes risk prediction - differences according to sex, age, family history and obesity.

Mühlenbruch K, Jeppesen C, Joost HG, Boeing H, Schulze MB.

PLoS One. 2013 May 20;8(5):e64307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064307. Print 2013. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2013;8(9). doi:10.1371/annotation/65bd3a11-b821-4f10-88d2-29b69a730f21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center