Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating.

Swallow KM, Zacks JM, Abrams RA.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):236-57. doi: 10.1037/a0015631. Erratum in: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):140.

2.

The influence of location and visual features on visual object memory.

Sun HM, Gordon RD.

Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1049-57. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1049.

3.

Updating objects in visual short-term memory is feature selective.

Ko PC, Seiffert AE.

Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):909-23. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.909.

PMID:
19679869
4.

Conceptual effects on representational momentum.

Reed CL, Vinson NG.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Aug;22(4):839-50.

PMID:
8756955
5.

Emotion modulates eye movement patterns and subsequent memory for the gist and details of movie scenes.

Subramanian R, Shankar D, Sebe N, Melcher D.

J Vis. 2014 Mar 26;14(3):31. doi: 10.1167/14.3.31.

PMID:
24672021
6.

Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.

Hollingworth A.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):58-69.

PMID:
16478340
7.

Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory.

Papenmeier F, Huff M, Schwan S.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):397-415. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0242-3.

PMID:
22090188
8.

Flexible working memory representation of the relationship between an object and its location as revealed by interactions with attention.

Sala JB, Courtney SM.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Oct;71(7):1525-33. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.7.1525.

9.

Perceptual organization influences visual working memory.

Woodman GF, Vecera SP, Luck SJ.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):80-7.

PMID:
12747493
10.

Contextual consistency facilitates long-term memory of perceptual detail in barely seen images.

Gronau N, Shachar M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1095-111. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000071. Epub 2015 May 25.

PMID:
26010591
11.
12.

A new object captures attention--but only when you know which objects are old.

Chua FK.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):797-808. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0066-6.

PMID:
21264698
13.

Complex dynamic scene perception: effects of attentional set on perceiving single and multiple event types.

Sanocki T, Sulman N.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):381-98. doi: 10.1037/a0030718. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

PMID:
23181683
14.

A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.

Flombaum JI, Scholl BJ.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):840-53.

PMID:
16846283
15.

Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory.

Woodman GF, Vogel EK.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):223-9.

PMID:
18605507
16.

Object-position binding in visual short-term memory for sequentially presented unfamiliar stimuli.

Sapkota RP, Pardhan S, van der Linde I.

Perception. 2011;40(5):538-48.

PMID:
21882718
17.

How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.

van Dam WO, Hommel B.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1184-92. doi: 10.1037/a0019955.

PMID:
20718565
18.
19.

The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.

Cohen MA, Pinto Y, Howe PD, Horowitz TS.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1422-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0089-7. Erratum in: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2668.

PMID:
21380611

Supplemental Content

Support Center