Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 177

1.

Synoptic reporting improves histopathological assessment of pancreatic resection specimens.

Gill AJ, Johns AL, Eckstein R, Samra JS, Kaufman A, Chang DK, Merrett ND, Cosman PH, Smith RC, Biankin AV, Kench JG; New South Wales Pancreatic Cancer Network (NSWPCN).

Pathology. 2009 Feb;41(2):161-7.

PMID:
19320058
2.

Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.

Austin R, Thompson B, Coory M, Walpole E, Francis G, Fritschi L.

Pathology. 2009;41(4):361-5. doi: 10.1080/00313020902884469.

PMID:
19404849
3.

What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?

Messenger DE, McLeod RS, Kirsch R.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1471-5. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2010-0558-OA.

PMID:
22032575
4.

Synoptic tool for reporting of hematological and lymphoid neoplasms based on World Health Organization classification and College of American Pathologists checklist.

Mohanty SK, Piccoli AL, Devine LJ, Patel AA, William GC, Winters SB, Becich MJ, Parwani AV.

BMC Cancer. 2007 Jul 31;7:144.

5.

Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.

Harvey JM, Sterrett GF, McEvoy S, Fritschi L, Jamrozik K, Ingram D, Joseph D, Dewar J, Byrne MJ; Key Cancers Patterns of Care Study Group.

Pathology. 2005 Oct;37(5):341-6.

PMID:
16194843
6.

Pathology reporting of resected colorectal cancers in New South Wales in 2000.

Chapuis PH, Chan C, Lin BP, Armstrong K, Armstrong B, Spigelman AD, O'Connell D, Leong D, Dent OF.

ANZ J Surg. 2007 Nov;77(11):963-9. Erratum in: ANZ J Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;78(1-2):112.

PMID:
17931258
7.

Concordance with breast cancer pathology reporting practice guidelines.

Wilkinson NW, Shahryarinejad A, Winston JS, Watroba N, Edge SB.

J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jan;196(1):38-43.

PMID:
12517547
8.

The advantage of using a synoptic pathology report format for cutaneous melanoma.

Karim RZ, van den Berg KS, Colman MH, McCarthy SW, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA.

Histopathology. 2008 Jan;52(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02921.x.

PMID:
18184262
9.

Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.

Beattie GC, McAdam TK, Elliott S, Sloan JM, Irwin ST.

Colorectal Dis. 2003 Nov;5(6):558-62.

PMID:
14617240
10.

The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology.

Branston LK, Greening S, Newcombe RG, Daoud R, Abraham JM, Wood F, Dallimore NS, Steward J, Rogers C, Williams GT.

Eur J Cancer. 2002 Apr;38(6):764-72.

PMID:
11937309
11.

Histologic characteristics enhance predictive value of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in resectable pancreas cancer.

Helm J, Centeno BA, Coppola D, Melis M, Lloyd M, Park JY, Chen DT, Malafa MP.

Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4080-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24503.

12.

The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.

Sluijter CE, van Lonkhuijzen LR, van Slooten HJ, Nagtegaal ID, Overbeek LI.

Virchows Arch. 2016 Jun;468(6):639-49. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1935-8. Epub 2016 Apr 21. Review.

13.

Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.

Winn RD, Robinson DR, Farmer KC, Bell SW.

ANZ J Surg. 2008 Sep;78(9):796-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04653.x.

PMID:
18844912
14.

Oesophageal and gastric cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.

Burroughs SH, Biffin AH, Pye JK, Williams GT.

J Clin Pathol. 1999 Jun;52(6):435-9.

15.

Quality of histopathological reporting on melanoma and influence of use of a synoptic template.

Haydu LE, Holt PE, Karim RZ, Madronio CM, Thompson JF, Armstrong BK, Scolyer RA.

Histopathology. 2010 May;56(6):768-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03546.x.

PMID:
20546342
16.

Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.

Hammond EH, Flinner RL.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Nov;121(11):1171-5.

PMID:
9372744
17.

Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.

Qu Z, Ninan S, Almosa A, Chang KG, Kuruvilla S, Nguyen N.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2007 Jun;127(6):898-903.

PMID:
17509987
18.

Electronic synoptic operative reporting: assessing the reliability and completeness of synoptic reports for pancreatic resection.

Park J, Pillarisetty VG, Brennan MF, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI, Dematteo RP, G Coit D, Janakos M, Allen PJ.

J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

PMID:
20800186
19.

Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.

Haugland HK, Casati B, Dørum LM, Bjugn R.

Hum Pathol. 2011 Jan;42(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

PMID:
20869747
20.

Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.

Bjugn R, Casati B, Norstein J.

Hum Pathol. 2008 Mar;39(3):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.06.019. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

PMID:
18187180

Supplemental Content

Support Center