Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

3.

Responsiveness of the Korean version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.

Wi SM, Gong HS, Bae KJ, Roh YH, Lee YH, Baek GH.

Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Jun;6(2):203-7. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.203. Epub 2014 May 16.

4.

Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.

Chatterjee JS, Price PE.

J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Feb;34(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.021.

PMID:
19181227
6.

Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings.

Uchiyama S, Imaeda T, Toh S, Kusunose K, Sawaizumi T, Wada T, Okinaga S, Nishida J, Omokawa S; Clinical Outcomes Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association; Impairment Evaluation Committee of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand.

J Orthop Sci. 2007 May;12(3):249-53. Epub 2007 May 31.

7.
8.

Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JSSH questionnaires to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release.

Iwatsuki K, Nishikawa K, Chaki M, Sato A, Morita A, Hirata H.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Feb;39(2):145-51. doi: 10.1177/1753193413485524. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

PMID:
23592539
9.

Responsiveness of the Korean version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (K-DASH) after carpal tunnel release.

Jeon SH, Lee JH, Chung MS, Baek GH, Oh JH, Lee YH, Gong HS.

Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):147-51. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.2.147. Epub 2011 May 12.

10.

An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the surgery for ulnar nerve (SUN) study group.

Song JW, Waljee JF, Burns PB, Chung KC, Gaston RG, Haase SC, Hammert WC, Lawton JN, Merrell GA, Nassab PF, Yang LJ; Surgery for the Ulnar Nerve (SUN) Study Group.

Neurosurgery. 2013 Jun;72(6):971-81; discussion 981-2; quiz 982. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31828ca327.

11.

Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?

Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ.

J Hand Surg Br. 2004 Apr;29(2):159-64.

PMID:
15010164
12.

Responsiveness of three Patient Report Outcome (PRO) measures in patients with hand fractures: A preliminary cohort study.

Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Page C, Ghomrawi HM, Wolff AL.

J Hand Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;28(4):403-10; quiz 411. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 27.

PMID:
26209162
13.

Validity and responsiveness of the DASH questionnaire as an outcome measure following ulnar nerve transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Ebersole GC, Davidge K, Damiano M, Mackinnon SE.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):81e-90e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290faf6.

PMID:
23806957
14.
15.
16.

Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.

Hwang PY, Ho CL.

Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9.

PMID:
17297379
17.

Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Yücel H, Seyithanoğlu H.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):23-9. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.13.0162.

PMID:
25803249
18.

Assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness and bias of three commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Bakhsh H, Ibrahim I, Khan W, Smitham P, Goddard N.

Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(4):335-40. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1005085.

PMID:
23043056
19.

Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury.

Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, Huang CH, Wu HC, Wang JD.

J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Mar;35(3):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.016. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

PMID:
20138712
20.

The Korean version of the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Kim JK, Lim HM.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Feb;40(2):200-5. doi: 10.1177/1753193414540083. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

PMID:
25005562

Supplemental Content

Support Center