Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

Reporting of systematic reviews of micronutrients and health: a critical appraisal.

Chung M, Balk EM, Ip S, Raman G, Yu WW, Trikalinos TA, Lichtenstein AH, Yetley EA, Lau J.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;89(4):1099-113. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26821. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

2.

Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Micronutrients and Health: A Critical Appraisal: Nutrition Research Series, Vol. 3.

Chung M, Balk EM, Ip S, Raman G, Yu WW, Trikalinos TA, Lichtenstein AH, Yetley EA, Lau J.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Mar.

3.

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG.

PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78.

4.

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Tricco AC, Catalá-López F, Li L, Reid EK, Sarkis-Onofre R, Moher D.

PLoS Med. 2016 May 24;13(5):e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. eCollection 2016 May.

5.

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.

Zhang J, Wang J, Han L, Zhang F, Cao J, Ma Y.

Nurs Outlook. 2015 Jul-Aug;63(4):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Review.

PMID:
26187084
6.

Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in "evidence-based" Chinese journals.

Li JL, Ge L, Ma JC, Zeng QL, Yao L, An N, Ding JX, Gan YH, Tian JH.

Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 7;3:58. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-58.

7.

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

Shea B, Boers M, Grimshaw JM, Hamel C, Bouter LM.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jun 13;6:27.

8.

Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.

Nicolau I, Ling D, Tian L, Lienhardt C, Pai M.

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Sep;17(9):1160-9. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0050. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23809432
9.

Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation.

Gianola S, Gasparini M, Agostini M, Castellini G, Corbetta D, Gozzer P, Li LC, Sirtori V, Taricco M, Tetzlaff JM, Turolla A, Moher D, Moja L.

Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;93(11):1456-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120382. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

PMID:
23744458
10.

Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.

Livas C, Pandis N, Ren Y.

Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):183-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju032. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

PMID:
25052374
11.

Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.

Faggion CM Jr, Huda F, Wasiak J.

J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):625-31. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12251. Review.

PMID:
24666018
12.

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.

Ma B, Qi GQ, Lin XT, Wang T, Chen ZM, Yang KH.

J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):813-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0274. Review.

PMID:
22924413
13.

The assessment of the quality of reporting of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in diagnostic tests published by authors in China.

Ge L, Wang JC, Li JL, Liang L, An N, Shi XT, Liu YC, Tian JH.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e85908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085908. eCollection 2014.

14.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation.

De Buitrago JG, Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Dec;144(12):1349-57.

PMID:
24282264
15.

Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.

Peters JP, Hooft L, Grolman W, Stegeman I.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136540. eCollection 2015. Review.

16.

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.017. Review.

PMID:
18394534
17.

Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.

Faggion CM Jr, Listl S, Alarcón MA.

J Clin Periodontol. 2015 May;42(5):488-94. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12394. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Review.

PMID:
25809114
18.
19.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

20.

Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.

Brito JP, Tsapas A, Griebeler ML, Wang Z, Prutsky GJ, Domecq JP, Murad MH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;66(6):633-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Review.

PMID:
23510557

Supplemental Content

Support Center