Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 205

1.

The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.

Moons WG, Mackie DM, Garcia-Marques T.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):32-44. doi: 10.1037/a0013461.

PMID:
19210062
2.

Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.

Corner A, Hahn U.

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):199-212. doi: 10.1037/a0016533.

PMID:
19751071
3.

Processing of persuasive in-group messages.

Mackie DM, Worth LT, Asuncion AG.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 May;58(5):812-22.

PMID:
2348369
4.

The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.

Tormala ZL, Desensi VL.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):114-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325677.

PMID:
19106081
5.

Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.

Rydell RJ, McConnell AR.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;31(1):99-110.

PMID:
15574665
6.

Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.

Pierro A, Mannetti L, Kruglanski AW, Sleeth-Keppler D.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):251-64.

PMID:
14769082
7.

Thinking straight while seeing red: the influence of anger on information processing.

Moons WG, Mackie DM.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):706-20.

PMID:
17440205
8.

Remembering makes evidence compelling: retrieval from memory can give rise to the illusion of truth.

Ozubko JD, Fugelsang J.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):270-6. doi: 10.1037/a0021323.

PMID:
21058878
9.

The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

Horcajo J, Petty RE, Briñol P.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):498-512. doi: 10.1037/a0018626.

PMID:
20649371
10.
11.

How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations.

Shestowsky D, Horowitz LM.

Law Hum Behav. 2004 Jun;28(3):305-37.

PMID:
15264449
12.

Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.

Reinhard MA, Sporer SL, Scharmach M, Marksteiner T.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Sep;101(3):467-84. doi: 10.1037/a0023726.

PMID:
21707196
13.
14.

Uncertainty orientation in the group context: categorization effects on persuasive message processing.

Hodson G, Sorrentino RM.

J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;143(3):291-312.

PMID:
12846514
15.

Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.

Briñol P, Petty RE, Barden J.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):711-27.

PMID:
17983296
16.

Effects of familiarity level and repetition on recognition accuracy.

Tussing AA, Greene RL.

Am J Psychol. 2001 Spring;114(1):31-41.

PMID:
11258228
17.

The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations.

de Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JB.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;31(1):24-33.

PMID:
15574659
19.

Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.

Clark JK, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Apr;34(4):565-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167207312527.

PMID:
18340037
20.

The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion.

Puckett JM, Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Fischer DL.

J Gerontol. 1983 May;38(3):340-3.

PMID:
6841930
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center