Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 86

1.

Commitment to meiosis: what determines the mode of division in budding yeast?

Simchen G.

Bioessays. 2009 Feb;31(2):169-77. doi: 10.1002/bies.200800124. Review.

PMID:
19204989
2.

Effects of the mitotic cell-cycle mutation cdc4 on yeast meiosis.

Simchen G, Hirschberg J.

Genetics. 1977 May;86(1):57-72.

3.

The Aurora kinase Ipl1 is necessary for spindle pole body cohesion during budding yeast meiosis.

Shirk K, Jin H, Giddings TH Jr, Winey M, Yu HG.

J Cell Sci. 2011 Sep 1;124(Pt 17):2891-6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.086652.

4.

The mother-bud neck as a signaling platform for the coordination between spindle position and cytokinesis in budding yeast.

Merlini L, Piatti S.

Biol Chem. 2011 Aug;392(8-9):805-12. doi: 10.1515/BC.2011.090. Review.

PMID:
21824008
5.

Intrinsic and cyclin-dependent kinase-dependent control of spindle pole body duplication in budding yeast.

Simmons Kovacs LA, Nelson CL, Haase SB.

Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Aug;19(8):3243-53. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0148. Epub 2008 May 14.

6.
7.

Reversal of cell determination in yeast meiosis: postcommitment arrest allows return to mitotic growth.

Honigberg SM, Esposito RE.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6559-63.

8.

Positive feedback of NDT80 expression ensures irreversible meiotic commitment in budding yeast.

Tsuchiya D, Yang Y, Lacefield S.

PLoS Genet. 2014 Jun 5;10(6):e1004398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004398. eCollection 2014 Jun.

9.

Prospore membrane formation: how budding yeast gets shaped in meiosis.

Moreno-Borchart AC, Knop M.

Microbiol Res. 2003;158(2):83-90. Review.

PMID:
12906380
10.

Autogamy in Paramecium. Cell cycle stage-specific commitment to meiosis.

Berger JD.

Exp Cell Res. 1986 Oct;166(2):475-85.

PMID:
3743667
11.

Kinetochore-independent chromosome poleward movement during anaphase of meiosis II in mouse eggs.

Deng M, Gao J, Suraneni P, Li R.

PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005249. Epub 2009 Apr 13.

12.

Mitotic, but not meiotic, oriented cell divisions in rat spermatogenesis.

Lagos-Cabré R, Moreno RD.

Reproduction. 2008 Apr;135(4):471-8. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0389. Epub 2008 Feb 22.

13.

Slk1 is a meiosis-specific Sid2-related kinase that coordinates meiotic nuclear division with growth of the forespore membrane.

Pérez-Hidalgo L, Rozalén AE, Martín-Castellanos C, Moreno S.

J Cell Sci. 2008 May 1;121(Pt 9):1383-92. doi: 10.1242/jcs.023812. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

14.

What determines whether chromosomes segregate reductionally or equationally in meiosis?

Simchen G, Hugerat Y.

Bioessays. 1993 Jan;15(1):1-8. Review.

PMID:
8466471
15.

Temporal control of the dephosphorylation of Cdk substrates by mitotic exit pathways in budding yeast.

Jin F, Liu H, Liang F, Rizkallah R, Hurt MM, Wang Y.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16177-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808719105. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

16.

Computational modelling of meiotic entry and commitment.

Bhola T, Kapuy O, Vinod PK.

Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):180. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17478-9.

17.

Cdc14 phosphatase directs centrosome re-duplication at the meiosis I to meiosis II transition in budding yeast.

Fox C, Zou J, Rappsilber J, Marston AL.

Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Jan 5;2:2. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10507.2.

18.

A catalogue of abnormalities in the division spindles of higher plants.

Shamina NV.

Cell Biol Int. 2005 May;29(5):384-91. Review.

PMID:
15982905
19.

ran1+ controls the transition from mitotic division to meiosis in fission yeast.

Beach D, Rodgers L, Gould J.

Curr Genet. 1985;10(4):297-311.

PMID:
3870979
20.

A nutrient dependant switch explains mutually exclusive existence of meiosis and mitosis initiation in budding yeast.

Wannige CT, Kulasiri D, Samarasinghe S.

J Theor Biol. 2014 Jan 21;341:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

PMID:
24099720

Supplemental Content

Support Center