Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 75

1.

Calling heads from tails: the role of mathematical modeling in understanding cell polarization.

Onsum MD, Rao CV.

Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009 Feb;21(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 23. Review.

2.

A Predictive Model for Yeast Cell Polarization in Pheromone Gradients.

Muller N, Piel M, Calvez V, Voituriez R, Gonçalves-Sá J, Guo CL, Jiang X, Murray A, Meunier N.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 14;12(4):e1004795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004795. eCollection 2016 Apr.

3.

Modeling vesicle traffic reveals unexpected consequences for Cdc42p-mediated polarity establishment.

Layton AT, Savage NS, Howell AS, Carroll SY, Drubin DG, Lew DJ.

Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 8;21(3):184-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.012.

4.

A comparison of mathematical models for polarization of single eukaryotic cells in response to guided cues.

Jilkine A, Edelstein-Keshet L.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1001121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001121. Epub 2011 Apr 28. Review.

5.

A system of counteracting feedback loops regulates Cdc42p activity during spontaneous cell polarization.

Ozbudak EM, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A.

Dev Cell. 2005 Oct;9(4):565-71.

6.

A bistable model of cell polarity.

Semplice M, Veglio A, Naldi G, Serini G, Gamba A.

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030977. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

7.

Cdc42--the centre of polarity.

Etienne-Manneville S.

J Cell Sci. 2004 Mar 15;117(Pt 8):1291-300. Review.

8.

Endocytosis optimizes the dynamic localization of membrane proteins that regulate cortical polarity.

Marco E, Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R, Altschuler SJ, Wu LF.

Cell. 2007 Apr 20;129(2):411-22.

9.

Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase.

Wedlich-Soldner R, Altschuler S, Wu L, Li R.

Science. 2003 Feb 21;299(5610):1231-5. Epub 2003 Jan 30.

10.

Mechanistic mathematical model of polarity in yeast.

Savage NS, Layton AT, Lew DJ.

Mol Biol Cell. 2012 May;23(10):1998-2013. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-10-0837. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

11.

Cell polarization in budding and fission yeasts.

Martin SG, Arkowitz RA.

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014 Mar;38(2):228-53. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12055. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Review.

12.

Insights into the network controlling the G1/S transition in budding yeast.

Barberis M, Klipp E.

Genome Inform. 2007;18:85-99.

PMID:
18546477
13.

Mathematical analysis of steady-state solutions in compartment and continuum models of cell polarization.

Zheng Z, Chou CS, Yi TM, Nie Q.

Math Biosci Eng. 2011 Oct 1;8(4):1135-68. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1135.

14.

Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex.

Kozubowski L, Saito K, Johnson JM, Howell AS, Zyla TR, Lew DJ.

Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 25;18(22):1719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.060. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

15.

Yeasts make their mark.

Chang F, Peter M.

Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;5(4):294-9. Review.

PMID:
12669083
16.

Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states.

Pruyne D, Bretscher A.

J Cell Sci. 2000 Feb;113 ( Pt 3):365-75. Review.

17.

Spontaneous cell polarization: undermining determinism.

Wedlich-Soldner R, Li R.

Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Apr;5(4):267-70. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
12669070
18.

Symmetry breaking and the establishment of cell polarity in budding yeast.

Johnson JM, Jin M, Lew DJ.

Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011 Dec;21(6):740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 28. Review.

19.

Cell polarity and morphogenesis in budding yeast.

Madden K, Snyder M.

Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:687-744. Review.

PMID:
9891811
20.

A mathematical model for neutrophil gradient sensing and polarization.

Onsum M, Rao CV.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Mar 16;3(3):e36. Epub 2007 Jan 9.

Supplemental Content

Support Center