Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 246

1.

Neural mechanisms of auditory discrimination of long-duration tonal patterns: a neural modeling and fMRI study.

Ulloa A, Husain FT, Kemeny S, Xu J, Braun AR, Horwitz B.

J Integr Neurosci. 2008 Dec;7(4):501-27.

2.

Neural bases of categorization of simple speech and nonspeech sounds.

Husain FT, Fromm SJ, Pursley RH, Hosey LA, Braun AR, Horwitz B.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Aug;27(8):636-51.

3.

Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults.

Wong PC, Perrachione TK, Parrish TB.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):995-1006.

PMID:
17133399
4.

Relating neuronal dynamics for auditory object processing to neuroimaging activity: a computational modeling and an fMRI study.

Husain FT, Tagamets MA, Fromm SJ, Braun AR, Horwitz B.

Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1701-20.

PMID:
15050592
5.

Temporal characteristics of audiovisual information processing.

Fuhrmann Alpert G, Hein G, Tsai N, Naumer MJ, Knight RT.

J Neurosci. 2008 May 14;28(20):5344-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5039-07.2008.

6.

Functional anatomy of pitch memory--an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.

Gaab N, Gaser C, Zaehle T, Jancke L, Schlaug G.

Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1417-26.

PMID:
12948699
7.

Functional neuroanatomy of auditory mismatch processing: an event-related fMRI study of duration-deviant oddballs.

Schall U, Johnston P, Todd J, Ward PB, Michie PT.

Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):729-36.

PMID:
14568447
8.

Perceiving pitch absolutely: comparing absolute and relative pitch possessors in a pitch memory task.

Schulze K, Gaab N, Schlaug G.

BMC Neurosci. 2009 Aug 27;10:106. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-106.

9.

Discrimination and categorization of speech and non-speech sounds in an MEG delayed-match-to-sample study.

Luo H, Husain FT, Horwitz B, Poeppel D.

Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):59-71. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

PMID:
16023868
10.

Neural Tuning to Low-Level Features of Speech throughout the Perisylvian Cortex.

Berezutskaya J, Freudenburg ZV, Güçlü U, van Gerven MAJ, Ramsey NF.

J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):7906-7920. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0238-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

PMID:
28716965
11.

Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Schmidt CF, Zaehle T, Meyer M, Geiser E, Boesiger P, Jancke L.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Jan;29(1):46-56.

PMID:
17318832
12.

Auditory processing abnormalities in schizotypal personality disorder: an fMRI experiment using tones of deviant pitch and duration.

Dickey CC, Morocz IA, Niznikiewicz MA, Voglmaier M, Toner S, Khan U, Dreusicke M, Yoo SS, Shenton ME, McCarley RW.

Schizophr Res. 2008 Aug;103(1-3):26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.04.041. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

13.

FMRI study relevant to the Mozart effect: brain areas involved in spatial-temporal reasoning.

Bodner M, Muftuler LT, Nalcioglu O, Shaw GL.

Neurol Res. 2001 Oct;23(7):683-90.

PMID:
11680506
14.

Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.

Zaehle T, Wüstenberg T, Meyer M, Jäncke L.

Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(9):2447-56.

PMID:
15525285
15.

Auditory stroop and absolute pitch: an fMRI study.

Schulze K, Mueller K, Koelsch S.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1579-90. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22010. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

PMID:
22359341
16.

Frontal-striatal circuitry activated by human peak-interval timing in the supra-seconds range.

Hinton SC, Meck WH.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Oct;21(2):171-82.

PMID:
15464349
17.

Brain network interactions in auditory, visual and linguistic processing.

Horwitz B, Braun AR.

Brain Lang. 2004 May;89(2):377-84.

PMID:
15068921
18.
19.

Self vs. other: neural correlates underlying agent identification based on unimodal auditory information as revealed by electrotomography (sLORETA).

Justen C, Herbert C, Werner K, Raab M.

Neuroscience. 2014 Feb 14;259:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.042. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

PMID:
24295635
20.

Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Wild CJ, Yusuf A, Wilson DE, Peelle JE, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS.

J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 3;32(40):14010-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012.

Supplemental Content

Support Center