Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 412

1.

A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.

Williamson AE, Sandor AJ, Justman BC.

J Endod. 2009 Jan;35(1):107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.09.022. Epub 2008 Nov 4.

PMID:
19084136
4.

Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.

Sabet NE, Lutfy RA.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Sep;106(3):e59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

PMID:
18602300
5.

Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.

Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Kahlmeier C.

Int Endod J. 2007 Jul;40(7):553-62. Epub 2007 May 18.

PMID:
17511784
6.

Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.

Kum KY, Kazemi RB, Cha BY, Zhu Q.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Apr;101(4):536-41. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Erratum in: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 May;101(5):693.

PMID:
16545720
7.

Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.

Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M.

Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):8-16.

PMID:
15606817
8.
9.

SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.

Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino VA, Prati C.

Int Endod J. 2004 Dec;37(12):832-9.

PMID:
15548274
10.

The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation.

Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK.

J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):236-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Dec 12.

PMID:
19166781
11.

A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.

Versümer J, Hülsmann M, Schäfers F.

Int Endod J. 2002 Jan;35(1):37-46.

PMID:
11853237
12.

A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments.

Hülsmann M, Schade M, Schäfers F.

Int Endod J. 2001 Oct;34(7):538-46.

PMID:
11601772
13.

Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments.

Hülsmann M, Herbst U, Schäfers F.

Int Endod J. 2003 Nov;36(11):748-56.

PMID:
14641438
14.

Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments.

Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Mühge M, Schäfers F.

Int Endod J. 2002 Nov;35(11):919-28.

PMID:
12453021
15.

A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.

Jodway B, Hülsmann M.

Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):71-80.

PMID:
16409331
16.

A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.

Al-Sudani D, Al-Shahrani S.

J Endod. 2006 Dec;32(12):1198-201. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

PMID:
17174683
17.
19.

A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.

Javaheri HH, Javaheri GH.

J Endod. 2007 Mar;33(3):284-6.

PMID:
17320715
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center