Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Growth conditions regulate the requirements for Caulobacter chromosome segregation.

Shebelut CW, Jensen RB, Gitai Z.

J Bacteriol. 2009 Feb;191(3):1097-100. doi: 10.1128/JB.00862-08.

2.

MreB actin-mediated segregation of a specific region of a bacterial chromosome.

Gitai Z, Dye NA, Reisenauer A, Wachi M, Shapiro L.

Cell. 2005 Feb 11;120(3):329-41.

3.

Bacterial DNA segregation by the actin-like MreB protein.

Kruse T, Gerdes K.

Trends Cell Biol. 2005 Jul;15(7):343-5. Review.

PMID:
15922599
4.
5.

Replication initiator DnaA binds at the Caulobacter centromere and enables chromosome segregation.

Mera PE, Kalogeraki VS, Shapiro L.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 11;111(45):16100-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418989111.

6.
7.

Caulobacter requires a dedicated mechanism to initiate chromosome segregation.

Toro E, Hong SH, McAdams HH, Shapiro L.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 7;105(40):15435-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807448105.

8.

Caulobacter chromosome segregation is an ordered multistep process.

Shebelut CW, Guberman JM, van Teeffelen S, Yakhnina AA, Gitai Z.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 10;107(32):14194-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005274107.

9.

Changes in nucleoid morphology and origin localization upon inhibition or alteration of the actin homolog, MreB, of Vibrio cholerae.

Srivastava P, Demarre G, Karpova TS, McNally J, Chattoraj DK.

J Bacteriol. 2007 Oct;189(20):7450-63.

10.

A parA homolog selectively influences positioning of the large chromosome origin in Vibrio cholerae.

Saint-Dic D, Frushour BP, Kehrl JH, Kahng LS.

J Bacteriol. 2006 Aug;188(15):5626-31.

11.

A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation.

Fogel MA, Waldor MK.

Genes Dev. 2006 Dec 1;20(23):3269-82.

12.

Bacterial mitotic machineries.

Gerdes K, Møller-Jensen J, Ebersbach G, Kruse T, Nordström K.

Cell. 2004 Feb 6;116(3):359-66. Review.

14.

Soj (ParA) DNA binding is mediated by conserved arginines and is essential for plasmid segregation.

Hester CM, Lutkenhaus J.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20326-31.

15.

ParABS systems of the four replicons of Burkholderia cenocepacia: new chromosome centromeres confer partition specificity.

Dubarry N, Pasta F, Lane D.

J Bacteriol. 2006 Feb;188(4):1489-96. Erratum in: J Bacteriol. 2006 Apr;188(8):3164.

16.

Linear ordering and dynamic segregation of the bacterial chromosome.

Breier AM, Cozzarelli NR.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 22;101(25):9175-6. Review. No abstract available.

17.

[Bacterial actin-like cytoskeletal protein as a new target of antibacterial agents].

Wachi M, Iwai N.

Nihon Saikingaku Zasshi. 2007 Nov;62(4):397-404. Review. Japanese. No abstract available.

18.

Bacteria spring a surprise.

Srinivasan R, Balasubramanian MK.

Elife. 2014 Jun 24;3:e03435. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03435.

19.

SMC complexes in bacterial chromosome condensation and segregation.

Strunnikov AV.

Plasmid. 2006 Mar;55(2):135-44. Review. Erratum in: Plasmid. 2006 Nov;56(3):235.

20.

Bacterial chromosome segregation.

Bartosik AA, Jagura-Burdzy G.

Acta Biochim Pol. 2005;52(1):1-34. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center