Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 160

1.

Effects of reinforcer magnitude and alternative reinforcer delay on preference for alcohol during a multiple-choice procedure.

Benson TA, Little CS, Henslee AM, Correia CJ.

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Feb 1;100(1-2):161-3. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Nov 13.

PMID:
19013028
2.

Use of a multiple-choice procedure with college student drinkers.

Little C, Correia CJ.

Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Dec;20(4):445-52. Erratum in: Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Jun;21(2):254.

PMID:
17176179
3.
4.

Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.

Lie C, Harper DN, Hunt M.

Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Oct 30.

PMID:
19015013
5.

Choice with initial and terminal link reinforcement: an alternative self-control paradigm.

Peters HL, Hunt M, Harper DN.

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jan;30(1):74-7.

PMID:
14709117
7.

Alcohol choice and outcome expectancies in social drinkers.

Duka T, Tasker R, Stephens DN.

Behav Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;9(7):643-53.

PMID:
9862089
8.

Species differences between rats and pigeons in choices with probabilistic and delayed reinforcers.

Mazur JE.

Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):220-4. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

PMID:
17343994
9.

Reinforcing and subjective effects of diazepam in nondrug-abusing volunteers.

deWit H, Pierri J, Johanson CE.

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 May;33(1):205-13.

PMID:
2780778
10.

Amount-dependent temporal discounting?

Ong EL, White KG.

Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):201-12.

PMID:
15157973
11.

Effects of variable training, signaled and unsignaled delays, and d-amphetamine on delay-discounting functions.

Slezak JM, Anderson KG.

Behav Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;20(5-6):424-36. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283305ef9.

PMID:
19730365
12.

Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.

da Costa Araújo S, Body S, Hampson CL, Langley RW, Deakin JF, Anderson IM, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E.

Behav Brain Res. 2009 Sep 14;202(2):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Apr 9. Erratum in: Behav Brain Res. 2009 Nov 5;203(2):321.

PMID:
19463712
13.

The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.

Kyonka EG.

Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

PMID:
18243576
14.

Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.

Bordner KA, Molina JC, Spear NE.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Apr;32(4):580-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00609.x.

PMID:
18366451
15.

Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration.

Higgins ST, Bickel WK, Hughes JR.

Life Sci. 1994;55(3):179-87.

PMID:
8007760
16.
17.

Human choice behaviour in a frequently changing environment.

Krägeloh CU, Zapanta AE, Shepherd D, Landon J.

Behav Processes. 2010 Jan;83(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

PMID:
19941940
18.

Effects of dose and time on the ability of alcohol to prime social drinkers.

Rose AK, Duka T.

Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;17(1):61-70.

PMID:
16377964
19.

Mecamylamine and ethanol preference in healthy volunteers.

Young EM, Mahler S, Chi H, de Wit H.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jan;29(1):58-65.

PMID:
15654292
20.

Multiple-choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans.

Griffiths RR, Troisi JR, Silverman K, Mumford GK.

Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;4(1):3-13.

PMID:
11224166

Supplemental Content

Support Center