Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 566

1.

Corneal and conjunctival epithelial staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.

Brautaset RL, Nilsson M, Leach N, Miller WL, Gire A, Quintero S, Bergmanson JP.

Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Nov;34(6):312-6. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181891439.

PMID:
18997539
2.

Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers.

Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Simon KM, Chivers DA, Edrington TB.

Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Jan;79(1):20-30.

PMID:
11828895
3.

Bulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.

Lakkis C, Brennan NA.

CLAO J. 1996 Jul;22(3):189-94.

PMID:
8828936
4.

Solution toxicity in soft contact lens daily wear is associated with corneal inflammation.

Carnt N, Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, Papas E.

Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84(4):309-15.

PMID:
17435514
5.
6.

Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining.

van der Worp E, de Brabander J, Swarbrick HA, Hendrikse F.

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;86(3):260-5. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318196bf49.

PMID:
19165124
7.

Blinking patterns and corneal staining.

Collins MJ, Iskander DR, Saunders A, Hook S, Anthony E, Gillon R.

Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Dec;32(6):287-93.

PMID:
17099390
8.

Human corneal epithelial cell shedding and fluorescein staining in response to silicone hydrogel lenses and contact lens disinfecting solutions.

Gorbet M, Peterson R, McCanna D, Woods C, Jones L, Fonn D.

Curr Eye Res. 2014 Mar;39(3):245-56. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.841255.

PMID:
24143910
9.

A novel method to predict the dry eye symptoms in new contact lens wearers.

Pult H, Murphy PJ, Purslow C.

Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;86(9):E1042-50. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b598cd.

PMID:
19668016
11.

Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft contact lens wearers.

Soni PS, Horner DG, Ross J.

Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Feb;73(2):70-85.

PMID:
8927315
13.

Impact of silicone hydrogel lenses and solutions on corneal epithelial permeability.

Duench S, Sorbara L, Keir N, Simpson T, Jones L.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jun;90(6):546-56. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318294c2a6.

PMID:
23645374
14.

Characteristics of corneal staining in hydrogel contact lens wearers.

Begley CG, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Long WD, McKenney CD, Chalmers RL.

Optom Vis Sci. 1996 Mar;73(3):193-200.

PMID:
8725022
15.

Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers.

Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman JP, Hebert E, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Glonek T, Olson MC.

CLAO J. 2002 Oct;28(4):211-6.

PMID:
12394549
16.

Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers.

Dillehay SM, Miller MB.

Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Nov;33(6 Pt 1):272-7.

PMID:
17993820
17.

Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions*.

Santodomingo-Rubido J, Barrado-Navascués E, Rubido-Crespo MJ, Sugimoto K, Sawano T.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jul;28(4):373-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00573.x.

PMID:
18565093
18.

Effects of different contact lens materials and contact lens-wearing periods on conjunctival cytology in asymptomatic contact lens wearers.

Tomatir DK, Erda N, Gürlü VP.

Eye Contact Lens. 2008 May;34(3):166-8. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31815788ea.

PMID:
18463482
19.
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center