Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 199

1.

Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 27;168(19):2131-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2131.

PMID:
18955643
2.

Comparison of the revised Geneva score with the Wells rule for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.

Klok FA, Kruisman E, Spaan J, Nijkeuter M, Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Perrier A, Le Gal G, Huisman MV.

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jan;6(1):40-4. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

3.
4.

Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

Douma RA, Gibson NS, Gerdes VE, Büller HR, Wells PS, Perrier A, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jan;101(1):197-200.

PMID:
19132208
5.

The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.

van Es J, Mos I, Douma R, Erkens P, Durian M, Nizet T, van Houten A, Hofstee H, ten Cate H, Ullmann E, Büller H, Huisman M, Kamphuisen PW.

Thromb Haemost. 2012 Jan;107(1):167-71. doi: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

PMID:
22072293
6.

Comparison of the Wells score with the simplified revised Geneva score for assessing pretest probability of pulmonary embolism.

Penaloza A, Melot C, Motte S.

Thromb Res. 2011 Feb;127(2):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

PMID:
21094985
7.
8.

VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies.

Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, Rodger M, Wuillemin WA, Le Gal G.

Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92. Review.

PMID:
19404542
9.

Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.

Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM, Nizet TA, Durian MF, Hovens MM, van Houten AA, Hofstee HM, Klok FA, ten Cate H, Ullmann EF, Büller HR, Kamphuisen PW, Huisman MV; Prometheus Study Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002.

PMID:
21646554
10.

Comparison of the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an Australian experience.

Wong DD, Ramaseshan G, Mendelson RM.

Intern Med J. 2011 Mar;41(3):258-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02204.x.

PMID:
20214691
11.

Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule.

Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Castel A, Werker-van Gelder L, Vlasveld LT, van Klink RC, Planken EV, Huisman MV.

Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;97(1):146-50.

PMID:
17200782
12.

Performance of the Wells and Revised Geneva scores for predicting pulmonary embolism.

Calisir C, Yavas US, Ozkan IR, Alatas F, Cevik A, Ergun N, Sahin F.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;16(1):49-52. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328304ae6d.

PMID:
18931619
13.

Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, Roy PM, Gourdier AL, Cornuz J, Perneger T, Perrier A.

Am J Med. 2002 Sep;113(4):269-75.

PMID:
12361811
14.

Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score.

Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):165-71.

PMID:
16461960
15.

A simple diagnostic strategy in hospitalized patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism.

Kruip MJ, Söhne M, Nijkeuter M, Kwakkel-Van Erp HM, Tick LW, Halkes SJ, Prins MH, Kramer MH, Huisman MV, Büller HR, Leebeek FW; Christopher Study Investigators.

J Intern Med. 2006 Nov;260(5):459-66.

16.

Comparison of Wells and Revised Geneva Rule to Assess Pretest Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in High-Risk Hospitalized Elderly Adults.

Di Marca S, Cilia C, Campagna A, D'Arrigo G, Abd ElHafeez S, Tripepi G, Puccia G, Pisano M, Mastrosimone G, Terranova V, Cardella A, Buonacera A, Stancanelli B, Zoccali C, Malatino L.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1091-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13459. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

PMID:
26032745
17.

C-reactive protein and D-dimer with clinical probability score in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.

Steeghs N, Goekoop RJ, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Huisman MV.

Br J Haematol. 2005 Aug;130(4):614-9.

PMID:
16098077
18.

Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, Nendaz M, Perneger T, Bounameaux H, Perrier A, Righini M.

J Thromb Haemost. 2010 May;8(5):957-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03801.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2. Review.

19.

[Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].

Ulukavak Ciftçi T, Köktürk N, Demir N, Oğuzülgen KI, Ekim N.

Tuberk Toraks. 2005;53(3):252-8. Turkish.

PMID:
16258884
20.

Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score.

Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A.

Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 8;161(1):92-7.

PMID:
11146703

Supplemental Content

Support Center