Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.

Weber WP, Engelberger S, Viehl CT, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Kuster S, Dirnhofer S, Wruk D, Oertli D, Marti WR.

World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2599-606. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9757-8.

PMID:
18836763
2.

Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.

Sauter ER, Hoffman JP, Ottery FD, Kowalyshyn MJ, Litwin S, Eisenberg BL.

Cancer. 1994 May 15;73(10):2607-12.

3.

Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.

Olson TP, Harter J, Muñoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2953-60. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

PMID:
17674109
4.

Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Esbona K, Li Z, Wilke LG.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3236-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2492-2. Epub 2012 Jul 31. Review.

5.

Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.

Cendán JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd.

J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):194-8.

PMID:
16038815
6.

An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Kim SH, Cornacchi SD, Heller B, Farrokhyar F, Babra M, Lovrics PJ.

Am J Surg. 2013 Jun;205(6):703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.08.010. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

PMID:
23465329
7.

The role of specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Lange M, Reimer T, Hartmann S, Glass Ä, Stachs A.

Breast. 2016 Apr;26:73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.014. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

PMID:
27017245
8.

Intraoperative margin assessment reduces reexcision rates in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.

Chagpar A, Yen T, Sahin A, Hunt KK, Whitman GJ, Ames FC, Ross MI, Meric-Bernstam F, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Kuerer HM.

Am J Surg. 2003 Oct;186(4):371-7.

PMID:
14553853
9.

Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer.

Riedl O, Fitzal F, Mader N, Dubsky P, Rudas M, Mittlboeck M, Gnant M, Jakesz R.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;35(3):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

PMID:
18706785
10.

Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.

Yu CC, Chiang KC, Kuo WL, Shen SC, Lo YF, Chen SC.

Breast. 2013 Oct;22(5):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

PMID:
23333255
11.

Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Whitman GJ, Ross MI, Ames FC, Feig BW, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1458-71. Epub 2007 Jan 28.

PMID:
17260108
12.

The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.

Weber S, Storm FK, Stitt J, Mahvi DM.

Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Sep-Oct;3(5):273-7.

PMID:
9327150
13.

Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Langhans L, Jensen MB, Talman MM, Vejborg I, Kroman N, Tvedskov TF.

JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):378-384. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4751.

PMID:
28002557
14.

Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.

Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC.

Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8.

PMID:
15757052
15.

Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients.

Gipponi M, Bassetti C, Canavese G, Catturich A, Di Somma C, Vecchio C, Nicolò G, Schenone F, Tomei D, Cafiero F.

J Surg Oncol. 2004 Mar;85(3):102-11. Review.

PMID:
14991881
16.

Radiography of the surgical specimen in early stage breast lesions: diagnostic reliability in the analysis of the resection margins.

Ciccarelli G, Di Virgilio MR, Menna S, Garretti L, Ala A, Giani R, Bussone R, Canavese G, Berardengo E.

Radiol Med. 2007 Apr;112(3):366-76. Epub 2007 Apr 20. English, Italian.

PMID:
17440696
17.

Intraoperative specimen radiography in patients with nonpalpable malignant breast lesions.

Schmachtenberg C, Engelken F, Fischer T, Bick U, Poellinger A, Fallenberg EM.

Rofo. 2012 Jul;184(7):635-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312730. Epub 2012 May 22.

PMID:
22618481
18.

Patent blue and air as an alternative for resection of nonpalpable breast lesions: a case series.

Vieira SC, Alves VC, Oliveira TC, Ibiapina JO, Soares EC, Crisanto ML.

Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):10-4. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321559.

19.

Diagnostic Value of Frozen Section in Patients with Non-Palpable Breast Lesions.

Abuoglu HH, Günay E, Sunamak O, Yiğitbaşı MR; -.

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016 Nov-Dec;111(6):500-504. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.111.6.500.

20.

Combined radioguided nonpalpable lesion localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy for early breast carcinoma.

Barros AC, Barros MA, Andrade FE, Mori LJ, Costa PA, Sheng PY, Pelizon CH.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1472-7. Epub 2007 Jan 17.

PMID:
17225979

Supplemental Content

Support Center