Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 145

1.

PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.

Scornavacca C, Berry V, Lefort V, Douzery EJ, Ranwez V.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 4;9:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-413.

2.

PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.

Ranwez V, Berry V, Criscuolo A, Fabre PH, Guillemot S, Scornavacca C, Douzery EJ.

Syst Biol. 2007 Oct;56(5):798-817.

PMID:
17918032
3.

Polynomial supertree methods revisited.

Brinkmeyer M, Griebel T, Böcker S.

Adv Bioinformatics. 2011;2011:524182. doi: 10.1155/2011/524182. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

4.

Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.

Eulenstein O, Chen D, Burleigh JG, Fernández-Baca D, Sanderson MJ.

Syst Biol. 2004 Apr;53(2):299-308.

PMID:
15205054
5.

Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O, Fernández-Baca D.

Algorithms Mol Biol. 2010 Feb 24;5:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-5-18.

6.

Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.

Kupczok A.

BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jul 13;11:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-205.

7.

COSPEDTree: COuplet Supertree by Equivalence Partitioning of Taxa Set and DAG Formation.

Bhattacharyya S, Mukherjee J.

IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2015 May-Jun;12(3):590-603. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2014.2366778.

PMID:
26357270
8.
9.

Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.

Holland B, Conner G, Huber K, Moulton V.

Syst Biol. 2007 Feb;56(1):57-67.

PMID:
17366137
10.

Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches.

Baker WJ, Savolainen V, Asmussen-Lange CB, Chase MW, Dransfield J, Forest F, Harley MM, Uhl NW, Wilkinson M.

Syst Biol. 2009 Apr;58(2):240-56. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp021. Epub 2009 May 30.

PMID:
20525581
11.

Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.

Berry V, Semple C.

Syst Biol. 2006 Apr;55(2):270-88.

PMID:
16611599
12.

The supertree tool kit.

Davis KE, Hill J.

BMC Res Notes. 2010 Apr 8;3:95. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-95.

13.

Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.

Fleischauer M, Böcker S.

Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;34(9):2408-2421. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx191.

PMID:
28873954
14.

Maximum likelihood supertrees.

Steel M, Rodrigo A.

Syst Biol. 2008 Apr;57(2):243-50. doi: 10.1080/10635150802033014.

PMID:
18398769
15.

Analyzing and synthesizing phylogenies using tree alignment graphs.

Smith SA, Brown JW, Hinchliff CE.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(9):e1003223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003223. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

16.

Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance.

Whidden C, Zeh N, Beiko RG.

Syst Biol. 2014 Jul;63(4):566-81. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu023. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

17.

Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.

Willson SJ.

Bull Math Biol. 2004 Nov;66(6):1755-83.

PMID:
15522354
18.

L.U.St: a tool for approximated maximum likelihood supertree reconstruction.

Akanni WA, Creevey CJ, Wilkinson M, Pisani D.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jun 12;15:183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-183.

19.

Triplet supertree heuristics for the tree of life.

Lin HT, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 30;10 Suppl 1:S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S1-S8.

20.

SuperTriplets: a triplet-based supertree approach to phylogenomics.

Ranwez V, Criscuolo A, Douzery EJ.

Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 15;26(12):i115-23. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq196.

Supplemental Content

Support Center