Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 50

1.

Potential for technical errors and subverted allocation can be reduced if certain guidelines are followed: examples from a web-based survey.

Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ, Berger VW.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Sep 27.

PMID:
18823755
2.

Some practical problems in implementing randomization.

Downs M, Tucker K, Christ-Schmidt H, Wittes J.

Clin Trials. 2010 Jun;7(3):235-45. doi: 10.1177/1740774510368300.

PMID:
20484491
3.
4.

Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.

Dupin-Spriet T, Fermanian J, Spriet A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1269-76.

PMID:
16291471
5.

Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.

Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T.

Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):684-90. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq141. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

PMID:
21320892
6.

Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.

Doig GS, Simpson F.

J Crit Care. 2005 Jun;20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3.

PMID:
16139163
7.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
8.
9.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
10.

Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.

Borm GF, Melis RJ, Teerenstra S, Peer PG.

Stat Med. 2005 Dec 15;24(23):3535-47.

PMID:
16007575
11.

[Patient's individuality and application of guidelines in surgery].

Schulte M.

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(4-5):321-3. German.

PMID:
16044793
12.

Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.

Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR.

Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):342-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6558. Review.

PMID:
19283747
13.

Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components.

Lustria ML, Cortese J, Noar SM, Glueckauf RL.

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):156-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.023. Epub 2008 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
18947966
14.

A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.

Cai H, Xia J, Xu D, Gao D, Yan Y.

J Biomed Inform. 2006 Dec;39(6):706-19. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

15.

[Why are guidelines more irrational than metaanalyses].

Steinert T.

Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Jul;36(5):238-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090237. Epub 2009 May 19. German.

PMID:
19455484
16.

The Internet as a research tool: worth the price of admission?

Lenert L, Skoczen S.

Ann Behav Med. 2002 Fall;24(4):251-6.

PMID:
12434936
17.

Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.

Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Lubowitz JH, Cabitza P, Denti M.

Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):834-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 21. Review.

PMID:
18589273
18.

The pursuit of clinical truth: role of epidemiology/observation studies.

Spector R, Vesell ES.

J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;40(11):1205-10.

PMID:
11075306
19.

The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countries.

Yu P, de Courten M, Pan E, Galea G, Pryor J.

Int J Med Inform. 2009 Aug;78(8):532-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

PMID:
19369114
20.

Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?

Whelan AM, Jurgens TM, Bowles SK, Doyle H.

Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):899-907. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L688.

PMID:
19417114

Supplemental Content

Support Center