Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Blinding in peer review.

Tomaszewski C.

J Med Toxicol. 2008 Sep;4(3):147-8. No abstract available.

2.

Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust.

Flaherty DK.

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):1081-3. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R691. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Review.

PMID:
23585648
3.

Advertising and clinical investigation.

Ciaglia P, Levy H, Ryan TF Jr.

Chest. 1990 Nov;98(5):1309-10. No abstract available.

PMID:
2225998
4.

Peer review.

Raza A, Preisler HD.

Ann Intern Med. 1985 Sep;103(3):470-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
4026093
5.

The ethics of peer review.

Southgate DA.

Br J Nutr. 1992 May;67(3):303-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
1622973
6.

Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process.

Weil J.

J Genet Couns. 2004 Jun;13(3):183-7.

PMID:
15617209
7.

Peer review and accountability.

Hardy LK.

Can J Nurs Res. 1991 Summer;23(2):1-5. English, French. No abstract available.

PMID:
1802369
8.

Veterinary pathology and peer review.

Cantor GH, Caswell JL, Crissman JW, Gillette DM, Gunson DE, Hogenesch H, Kiupel M, Mense MG, Miller MA, Rush LJ, Leger JA, Schoeb TR, Sellers RS, Sills RC, Swayne DE, Thomas HC, Ward JM, Alden CL.

Vet Pathol. 2009 Mar;46(2):173-5. doi: 10.1354/vp.46-2-173. No abstract available.

PMID:
19261628
9.

Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review.

Cotton P.

JAMA. 1993 Dec 15;270(23):2775-8. No abstract available. Erratum in: JAMA 1994 Jul 6;272(1):11.

PMID:
8133598
10.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Liesegang TJ.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020. No abstract available.

PMID:
24929824
11.

The peer review process and JSES procedures.

Iannotti JP, Mallon WJ.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Feb;22(2):149. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.002. No abstract available.

PMID:
23352468
12.

Perfecting peer review?

[No authors listed]

Nat Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):1-2. doi: 10.1038/nm0111-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
21217648
13.

How does peer review work?

Aaron L.

Radiol Technol. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(6):553-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
18650531
14.

Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?

Relman AS.

West J Med. 1990 Nov;153(5):520-2. No abstract available.

15.

Transparent peer review--an appreciation of the reviewers' contribution to a published article.

Linder S, Schliwa M, Werner S, Gebauer D.

Eur J Cell Biol. 2010 Nov;89(11):779. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Sep 1. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
20813427
16.

Journal peer reviewing. Anonymity or disclosure?

DeBakey L.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar;108(3):345-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
2310331
17.

Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation.

Zhu J, Fung G, Wong WH, Li Z, Xu C.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1073-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9683-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

PMID:
26169697
18.

Improving the quality of peer reviewed literature on diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative.

Price CP.

Clin Chim Acta. 2003 Aug;334(1-2):1-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
12867272
19.

On peer review.

Nativio DG.

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1991 Jan-Mar;3(1):1. No abstract available.

PMID:
2007055
20.

Developing peer review.

Pourquié O, Brown K.

Development. 2015 Apr 15;142(8):1389. doi: 10.1242/dev.124206. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center