Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 72

1.

Native anterior cruciate ligament obliquity versus anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity: an observational study using navigated measurements.

Stanford FC, Kendoff D, Warren RF, Pearle AD.

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):114-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546508323257. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

PMID:
18815237
2.

Comparison of 3-dimensional obliquity and anisometric characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament graft positions using surgical navigation.

Pearle AD, Shannon FJ, Granchi C, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF.

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1534-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546508315536. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

PMID:
18390491
3.

Anatomic double-bundle reconstruction techniques result in graft obliquities that closely mimic the native anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.

Kyung BS, Kim JG, Chang M, Jang KM, Lee SS, Ahn JH, Wang JH.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1302-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513484692. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

PMID:
23608758
4.

Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.

Brophy RH, Voos JE, Shannon FJ, Granchi CC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Pearle AD.

Am J Sports Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):2196-203. doi: 10.1177/0363546508320764. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

PMID:
18669985
5.

A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.

Bedi A, Musahl V, O'Loughlin P, Maak T, Citak M, Dixon P, Pearle AD.

Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1788-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546510369303. Epub 2010 Jun 21.

PMID:
20566720
6.

Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle.

Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA.

Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1349-58. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361234. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

PMID:
20423987
7.

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of conventional, central, and horizontal single-bundle virtual graft positions.

Brophy RH, Pearle AD.

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):1317-23. doi: 10.1177/0363546509333007. Epub 2009 Mar 27.

PMID:
19329787
9.

Replication of the range of native anterior cruciate ligament fiber length change behavior achieved by different grafts: measurement using computer-assisted navigation.

Robinson J, Stanford FC, Kendoff D, Stüber V, Pearle AD.

Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):1406-11. doi: 10.1177/0363546509331941. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

PMID:
19369575
11.

Relation between anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity and knee laxity in elite athletes at the National Football League combine.

Mall NA, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH.

Arthroscopy. 2012 Aug;28(8):1104-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.12.018. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

PMID:
22421564
12.

Correlation between anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity and tibial rotation during dynamic pivoting activities in patients with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo examination.

Zampeli F, Ntoulia A, Giotis D, Tsiaras VA, Argyropoulou M, Pappas E, Georgoulis AD.

Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):234-46. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.285. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

PMID:
22078004
13.

Effect of reamer design on posteriorization of the tibial tunnel during endoscopic transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Bhatia S, Korth K, Van Thiel GS, Gupta D, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr, Verma NN.

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1282-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513483534. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

PMID:
23585487
14.

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical cadaveric study of a rectangular quadriceps and bone--patellar tendon--bone graft configuration versus a round hamstring graft.

Herbort M, Tecklenburg K, Zantop T, Raschke MJ, Hoser C, Schulze M, Petersen W, Fink C.

Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.030. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

PMID:
24140140
15.

Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C.

Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):1987-96. doi: 10.1177/0363546510372797. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

PMID:
20702859
16.

A comparison of anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel orientation: anatomic vs. transtibial.

Potter MS, Werner FW, Sutton LG, Schweizer SK.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Jul;27(6):602-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 28.

PMID:
22285190
17.

Biomechanical comparison of anatomic double-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and nonanatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA.

Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):279-88. doi: 10.1177/0363546510392350. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21239692
18.

Comparison of sagittal obliquity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging.

Ayerza MA, Múscolo DL, Costa-Paz M, Makino A, Rondón L.

Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):257-61. Review.

PMID:
12627149
19.

Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.

Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR.

Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1141-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359072. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

PMID:
20348284
20.

Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.

Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH.

Am J Sports Med. 2005 May;33(5):712-8. Epub 2005 Feb 16.

PMID:
15722268

Supplemental Content

Support Center