Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 70

1.

Subject eligibility criteria can substantially influence the results of alcohol-treatment outcome research.

Humphreys K, Harris AH, Weingardt KR.

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Sep;69(5):757-64.

2.

Prevalence and predictors of research participant eligibility criteria in alcohol treatment outcome studies, 1970-98.

Humphreys K, Weingardt KR, Horst D, Joshi AA, Finney JW.

Addiction. 2005 Sep;100(9):1249-57. Review.

PMID:
16128714
4.
5.
6.
7.

Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles.

Blümle A, Meerpohl JJ, Rücker G, Antes G, Schumacher M, von Elm E.

BMJ. 2011 Apr 5;342:d1828. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1828.

8.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

9.

Outcome predictors and spectrum of treatment eligibility with prospective protocolized management of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Jaffe J, AlKhawam L, Du H, Tobin K, O'Leary J, Pollock G, Batjer HH, Awad IA.

Neurosurgery. 2009 Mar;64(3):436-45; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000330402.20883.1B.

PMID:
19240605
10.

The generalizability of antidepressant efficacy trials to routine psychiatric out-patient practice.

van der Lem R, van der Wee NJ, van Veen T, Zitman FG.

Psychol Med. 2011 Jul;41(7):1353-63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002175.

PMID:
21078225
11.

Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Burns T, Knapp M, Catty J, Healey A, Henderson J, Watt H, Wright C.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. Review.

12.

Controlling for selection bias in the evaluation of Alcoholics Anonymous as aftercare treatment.

Fortney J, Booth B, Zhang M, Humphrey J, Wiseman E.

J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Nov;59(6):690-7.

PMID:
9811090
13.

Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part I. Alcohol use and related consequences.

Clifford PR, Maisto SA, Davis CM.

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):519-28.

PMID:
17568955
14.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
15.

Computer-based screening of patients with HIV/AIDS for clinical-trial eligibility.

Carlson RW, Tu SW, Lane NM, Lai TL, Kemper CA, Musen MA, Shortliffe EH.

Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1995 Mar 28;Doc No 179:[3347 words; 32 paragraphs].

PMID:
7719564
16.

Issues in the development of subject recruitment strategies and eligibility criteria in multisite trials of matching.

Zweben A, Donovan DM, Randall CL, Barrett D, Dermen K, Kabela E, McRee B, Meyers R, Rice C, Rosengren D, et al.

J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994 Dec;12:62-9.

PMID:
7723000
18.

Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research.

Clifford PR, Maisto SA.

J Stud Alcohol. 2000 Nov;61(6):787-93. Review.

PMID:
11188483
19.

Generalizability of clinical trial results for bipolar disorder to community samples: findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Hoertel N, Le Strat Y, Lavaud P, Dubertret C, Limosin F.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;74(3):265-70. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07935.

PMID:
23561233
20.
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center