Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Gow DW Jr, Segawa JA, Ahlfors SP, Lin FH.

Neuroimage. 2008 Nov 15;43(3):614-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

2.

Rules from words: a dynamic neural basis for a lawful linguistic process.

Gow DW Jr, Nied AC.

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e86212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086212. eCollection 2014.

4.

Articulatory mediation of speech perception: a causal analysis of multi-modal imaging data.

Gow DW Jr, Segawa JA.

Cognition. 2009 Feb;110(2):222-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Dec 24.

PMID:
19110238
5.
6.

The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation.

Myers EB, Blumstein SE.

Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):278-88. Epub 2007 May 15.

PMID:
17504782
7.

Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception.

Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis MH.

J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;32(25):8443-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012.

8.

Independence of early speech processing from word meaning.

Travis KE, Leonard MK, Chan AM, Torres C, Sizemore ML, Qu Z, Eskandar E, Dale AM, Elman JL, Cash SS, Halgren E.

Cereb Cortex. 2013 Oct;23(10):2370-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs228. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

9.

Spatiotemporal convergence of semantic processing in reading and speech perception.

Vartiainen J, Parviainen T, Salmelin R.

J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 22;29(29):9271-80. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5860-08.2009.

10.

Top-down knowledge supports the retrieval of lexical information from degraded speech.

Hannemann R, Obleser J, Eulitz C.

Brain Res. 2007 Jun 11;1153:134-43. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

PMID:
17451657
11.

Comprehension of degraded speech sounds with m-sequence modulation: an fMRI study.

Takeichi H, Koyama S, Terao A, Takeuchi F, Toyosawa Y, Murohashi H.

Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2697-706. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.063. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

PMID:
19878726
12.
13.

Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: a Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data.

Gow DW Jr, Keller CJ, Eskandar E, Meng N, Cash SS.

Brain Lang. 2009 Jul;110(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

14.

Localization of sublexical speech perception components.

Turkeltaub PE, Coslett HB.

Brain Lang. 2010 Jul;114(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

15.
16.

Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.

Ding L, Yuan H.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Apr;34(4):775-95. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21473. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

PMID:
22102512
17.

Componential Granger causality, and its application to identifying the source and mechanisms of the top-down biased activation that controls attention to affective vs sensory processing.

Ge T, Feng J, Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET.

Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1846-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.047. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

PMID:
21888980
18.

Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation.

Dikker S, Pylkkänen L.

Brain Lang. 2013 Oct;127(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23040469
19.

Functional asymmetries in the representation of noise-vocoded speech.

Millman RE, Woods WP, Quinlan PT.

Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

PMID:
20946961
20.

Objective phonological and subjective perceptual characteristics of syllables modulate spatiotemporal patterns of superior temporal gyrus activity.

Frye RE, Fisher JM, Witzel T, Ahlfors SP, Swank P, Liederman J, Halgren E.

Neuroimage. 2008 May 1;40(4):1888-901. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.048. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

Supplemental Content

Support Center