Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 82

1.

Amended reports: development and validation of a taxonomy of defects.

Meier FA, Zarbo RJ, Varney RC, Bonsal M, Schultz DS, Vrbin CM, Grzybicki DM, Raab SS.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Aug;130(2):238-46. doi: 10.1309/9UPELFVQU5WLCUHX.

PMID:
18628093
2.

Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.

Meier FA, Varney RC, Zarbo RJ.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2011 Sep;18(5):406-13. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318229bf20. Review.

PMID:
21841408
4.

Surgical pathology report defects: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 73 institutions.

Volmar KE, Idowu MO, Hunt JL, Souers RJ, Meier FA, Nakhleh RE.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 May;138(5):602-12. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0099-CP.

PMID:
24786118
6.

Another quality assurance issue--amended reports: what do we really know about them?

Stastny JF, Geisinger KR, Michael CW, Raab SS, Powers CN, Davila RM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 1998 Jan;18(1):67-70.

PMID:
9451561
7.

Diagnostic 'errors' in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories.

Leong AS, Braye S, Bhagwandeen B.

Pathology. 2006 Dec;38(6):490-7. Review.

PMID:
17393975
8.

Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.

Roy JE, Hunt JL.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2010 Sep;17(5):359-65. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181ece0db. Review.

PMID:
20733354
9.
10.
11.

Quality Assurance in Breast Pathology: Lessons Learned From a Review of Amended Reports.

Harrison BT, Dillon DA, Richardson AL, Brock JE, Guidi AJ, Lester SC.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Feb;141(2):260-266. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0018-OA. Epub 2016 Dec 13. Review.

PMID:
27959581
12.

Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.

Renshaw AA, Gould EW.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 May;125(5):737-9.

PMID:
16707375
13.

Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors.

Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, Elstein AS, Hasler S, Kabongo ML, Krosnjar N, Odwazny R, Wisniewski MF, McNutt RA.

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1881-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333.

PMID:
19901140
14.

Errors in Surgical Pathology Reports: a Study from a Major Center in Pakistan.

Ahmad Z, Idrees R, Uddin N, Ahmed A, Fatima S.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(4):1869-74.

15.

Interobserver variation in the histopathologic reporting of key prognostic parameters, particularly clark level, affects pathologic staging of primary cutaneous melanoma.

Murali R, Hughes MT, Fitzgerald P, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA.

Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):641-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed973.

PMID:
19300224
16.

Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.

Raab SS, Stone CH, Wojcik EM, Geisinger KR, Dahmoush L, Garcia FU, Grzybicki DM, Janosky JE, Meier FA, Zarbo RJ.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Dec;126(6):836-42.

PMID:
17074685
17.

Diagnostic errors in patients dying in hospital: radiology's contribution.

Heriot GS, McKelvie P, Pitman AG.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02065.x.

PMID:
19527365
18.

Central pathology review in multicenter trials and studies: lessons from the nephroblastoma trials.

Vujanić GM, Sandstedt B, Kelsey A, Sebire NJ.

Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):1977-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24214.

19.

Critical values in surgical pathology.

Pereira TC, Liu Y, Silverman JF.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 Aug;122(2):201-5.

PMID:
15323136
20.

Clinical significance of non-diagnostic pathology results from percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsy: experience of a tertiary hospital without an on-site cytopathologist.

Min JW, Lee SM, Chung DH, Yim JJ, Yang SC, Yoo CG, Kim YW, Han SK, Shim YS, Chung HS.

Respirology. 2009 Sep;14(7):1042-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01610.x.

PMID:
19740264

Supplemental Content

Support Center