Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 81

1.

The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?

Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, Steele RJ, Brophy JM, Carnevale F, Eisenberg MJ, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Macdonald ME, Pilote L, Rossignol M.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 21;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-19.

3.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, Tanajewski L, Turner D, Price A.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. Review.

4.

Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.

Parker D, Mills S, Abbey J.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

PMID:
21631819
5.

Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).

Brettschneider C, Lühmann D, Raspe H.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.

6.

Being sceptical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction.

Higgins JP, Spiegelhalter DJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):96-104.

PMID:
11914302
7.

Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.

Ford AC, Guyatt GH, Talley NJ, Moayyedi P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19920807
8.

A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.

Clark L, Fairhurst C, Hewitt CE, Birks Y, Brabyn S, Cockayne S, Rodgers S, Hicks K, Hodgson R, Littlewood E, Torgerson DJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

PMID:
24909873
9.

The effectiveness of interventions in workplace health promotion as to maintain the working capacity of health care personal.

Buchberger B, Heymann R, Huppertz H, Friepörtner K, Pomorin N, Wasem J.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011;7:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/hta000097. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

10.

Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.

Glasziou PP, Shepperd S, Brassey J.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-23.

11.

Individual health services.

Schnell-Inderst P, Hunger T, Hintringer K, Schwarzer R, Seifert-Klauss VR, Gothe H, Wasem J, Siebert U.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011;7:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/hta000096. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

12.

Reanalysis of systematic reviews: the case of invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes.

Kuukasjärvi P, Nordhausen K, Malmivaara A.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):484-96.

PMID:
16984682
13.

Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.

Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Ackerman MB.

World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):167-76.

PMID:
18575311
14.

Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):43-54.

PMID:
12897595
15.

Bone graft substitutes for the treatment of traumatic fractures of the extremities.

Hagen A, Gorenoi V, Schönermark MP.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/hta000102. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

17.

Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.

Kranke P.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):763-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a560a.

PMID:
20523217
18.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

19.

Making evidence more wanted: a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Dec;10(4):338-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00288.x. Review.

PMID:
23173658
20.

Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.

Koretz RL.

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002 Sep;5(5):467-74. Review.

PMID:
12172468

Supplemental Content

Support Center