Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

Perception of phosphenes and flashed alphabetical characters is enhanced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of anterior frontal lobe: the thalamic gate hypothesis.

Amassian V, Mari Z, Sagliocco L, Hassan N, Maccabee P, Cracco JB, Cracco RQ, Bodis-Wollner I.

Perception. 2008;37(3):375-88.

PMID:
18491715
2.

The sound-induced phosphene illusion.

Bolognini N, Convento S, Fusaro M, Vallar G.

Exp Brain Res. 2013 Dec;231(4):469-78. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3711-1. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

PMID:
24091771
3.

Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Gothe J, Brandt SA, Irlbacher K, Röricht S, Sabel BA, Meyer BU.

Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):479-90.

PMID:
11872606
4.

Subjective characteristics of TMS-induced phosphenes originating in human V1 and V2.

Salminen-Vaparanta N, Vanni S, Noreika V, Valiulis V, Móró L, Revonsuo A.

Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2751-60. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht131. Epub 2013 May 21.

PMID:
23696280
5.

State-dependency effects on TMS: a look at motive phosphene behavior.

Najib U, Horvath JC, Silvanto J, Pascual-Leone A.

J Vis Exp. 2010 Dec 28;(46). pii: 2273. doi: 10.3791/2273.

6.

Quantitative analysis of phosphenes induced by navigation-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Tani N, Hirata M, Motoki Y, Saitoh Y, Yanagisawa T, Goto T, Hosomi K, Kozu A, Kishima H, Yorifuji S, Yoshimine T.

Brain Stimul. 2011 Jan;4(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Apr 18.

PMID:
21255752
7.

Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements.

Meyer BU, Diehl R, Steinmetz H, Britton TC, Benecke R.

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:121-34.

PMID:
1773752
8.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals high test-retest reliability for phosphenes but not for suppression of visual perception.

Siniatchkin M, Schlicke C, Stephani U.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;122(12):2475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

PMID:
21641863
9.

Investigation of the primary visual cortex using short-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Sparing R, Dambeck N, Stock K, Meister IG, Huetter D, Boroojerdi B.

Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jul 15;382(3):312-6. Epub 2005 Apr 14.

PMID:
15925110
10.

Magnetic stimulation of visual cortex: factors influencing the perception of phosphenes.

Ray PG, Meador KJ, Epstein CM, Loring DW, Day LJ.

J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;15(4):351-7.

PMID:
9736469
11.

Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes.

Laakso I, Hirata A.

J Neural Eng. 2013 Aug;10(4):046009. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/4/046009. Epub 2013 Jul 1.

PMID:
23813466
12.

Waves of awareness for occipital and parietal phosphenes perception.

Bagattini C, Mazzi C, Savazzi S.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:114-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

PMID:
25698639
13.

Perceptual load modulates visual cortex excitability to magnetic stimulation.

Muggleton N, Lamb R, Walsh V, Lavie N.

J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):516-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.01287.2007. Epub 2008 May 21.

14.

[Examination of the visual system with transcranial magnetic stimulation].

Meyer BU, Diehl RR.

Nervenarzt. 1992 Jun;63(6):328-34. Review. German.

PMID:
1635614
15.

Spreading photoparoxysmal EEG response is associated with an abnormal cortical excitability pattern.

Siniatchkin M, Groppa S, Jerosch B, Muhle H, Kurth C, Shepherd AJ, Siebner H, Stephani U.

Brain. 2007 Jan;130(Pt 1):78-87. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

PMID:
17121743
16.

Phosphene perception is due to the ultra-weak photon emission produced in various parts of the visual system: glutamate in the focus.

Császár N, Scholkmann F, Salari V, Szőke H, Bókkon I.

Rev Neurosci. 2016 Apr 1;27(3):291-9. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2015-0039. Review.

17.

Making the blindsighted see.

Silvanto J, Cowey A, Lavie N, Walsh V.

Neuropsychologia. 2007 Nov 5;45(14):3346-50. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

PMID:
17669445
18.

Pulse configuration-dependent effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual perception.

Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Demmer I, Sommer M, Paulus W.

Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 3;13(17):2229-33.

PMID:
12488802
19.

Spatial attention changes excitability of human visual cortex to direct stimulation.

Bestmann S, Ruff CC, Blakemore C, Driver J, Thilo KV.

Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 23;17(2):134-9.

20.

A novel approach for documenting phosphenes induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Elkin-Frankston S, Fried PJ, Pascual-Leone A, Rushmore RJ 3rd, Valero-Cabr A.

J Vis Exp. 2010 Apr 1;(38). pii: 1762. doi: 10.3791/1762.

Supplemental Content

Support Center