Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 170

1.

Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis.

Cohen MS, Hanley RS, Kurteva T, Ruthazer R, Silverman ML, Sorcini A, Hamawy K, Roth RA, Tuerk I, Libertino JA.

Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):371-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.049. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

PMID:
18395322
2.

Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.

King CR, McNeal JE, Gill H, Presti JC Jr.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91.

PMID:
15145152
3.

Needle biopsy DNA ploidy status predicts grade shifting in prostate cancer.

Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Ambros RA, Nazeer T, Jennings TA, Kaufman RP Jr, Fisher HA, Rifkin MD, Kallakury BV.

Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Mar;23(3):296-301.

PMID:
10078920
4.

Editorial comment on: comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis.

Scattoni V.

Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):379. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.050. Epub 2008 Mar 28. No abstract available.

PMID:
18395328
5.

Editorial comment on: comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: the Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis.

Montironi R, Cheng L, Lòpez Beltran A.

Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):380-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.051. Epub 2008 Mar 28. No abstract available.

PMID:
18395327
6.
7.

Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.

Divrik RT, Eroglu A, Sahin A, Zorlu F, Ozen H.

Urol Oncol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):376-82.

PMID:
17826653
8.

Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?

Stav K, Judith S, Merald H, Leibovici D, Lindner A, Zisman A.

Urol Oncol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):383-6.

PMID:
17826654
9.

Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.

Pinthus JH, Witkos M, Fleshner NE, Sweet J, Evans A, Jewett MA, Krahn M, Alibhai S, Trachtenberg J.

J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):979-84; discussion 984.

PMID:
16890675
10.

Prostate biopsy volume indices do not predict for significant Gleason upgrading.

King CR, Patel DA, Terris MK.

Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr;28(2):125-9.

PMID:
15803004
12.

Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.

Dong F, Jones JS, Stephenson AJ, Magi-Galluzzi C, Reuther AM, Klein EA.

J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):896-900; discussion 900. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.060. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

PMID:
18207180
13.

Validation of a prediction model for low volume/low grade cancer: application in selecting patients for active surveillance.

Ochiai A, Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Donnelly B, Babaian RJ.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):907-10.

PMID:
17296373
14.

Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?

Kunju LP, Daignault S, Wei JT, Shah RB.

Hum Pathol. 2009 Apr;40(4):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.07.020. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

PMID:
19144380
15.

Prediction of percent Gleason grade 4/5 by multiple core biopsies.

Glaessgen A, Busch C, Norberg M, Häggman M, Nilsson B, Egevad L.

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(6):465-71.

PMID:
17130098
16.

Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.

Moussa AS, Li J, Soriano M, Klein EA, Dong F, Jones JS.

BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):43-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08059.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.

17.
18.

Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores.

Mian BM, Lehr DJ, Moore CK, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Ross JS, Jennings TA, Nazeer T.

Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):379-83.

PMID:
16461089
19.

Impact of the percentage of positive biopsy cores on the further stratification of primary grade 3 and grade 4 Gleason score 7 tumors in radical prostatectomy patients.

Vira MA, Tomaszewski JE, Hwang WT, D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Vanarsdalen K, Wein AJ, Malkowicz SB.

Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):1015-9.

PMID:
16286115
20.

Changes in prognostic significance and predictive accuracy of Gleason grading system throughout PSA era: impact of grade migration in prostate cancer.

Mitchell RE, Shah JB, Desai M, Mansukhani MM, Olsson CA, Benson MC, McKiernan JM.

Urology. 2007 Oct;70(4):706-10. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

PMID:
17707892

Supplemental Content

Support Center