Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 137

1.

Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
18394536
2.

Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.

Golder S, McIntosh HM, Loke Y.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 May 8;6:22.

3.

Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.

Golder S, Loke YK, Zorzela L.

Health Info Libr J. 2014 Jun;31(2):92-105. doi: 10.1111/hir.12041. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

4.

Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011.

Golder S, Loke YK, Zorzela L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.013.

PMID:
23347849
5.

Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?

Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL.

Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.

6.

Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Beynon R, Leeflang MM, McDonald S, Eisinga A, Mitchell RL, Whiting P, Glanville JM.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3. Review.

7.
8.

Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review.

Golder S, Loke Y.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Apr;97(2):84-92. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.004. Review.

10.

No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Tetzlaff J, Cogo E, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):748-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Feb 14.

PMID:
18586178
11.

An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.

Major MP, Major PW, Flores-Mir C.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137(9):1252-7.

PMID:
16946429
12.
13.

Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.

Whiting P, Westwood M, Burke M, Sterne J, Glanville J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Oct 15.

PMID:
18313560
14.

Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.

Crumley ET, Wiebe N, Cramer K, Klassen TP, Hartling L.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. Review.

15.

Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.

Cornelius VR, Perrio MJ, Shakir SA, Smith LA.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Dec;18(12):1223-31. doi: 10.1002/pds.1844.

PMID:
19757414
16.

Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects.

Golder S, Loke Y, McIntosh HM.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jan 27;6:3.

17.

Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.

Relevo R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S28-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1873-8.

18.

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.012. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Review.

19.

Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.

Yoshii A, Plaut DA, McGraw KA, Anderson MJ, Wellik KE.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jan;97(1):21-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.004.

Supplemental Content

Support Center