Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 370

1.

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.017. Review.

PMID:
18394534
2.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

3.

A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1095-1104. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
17938050
4.

An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.

Tricco AC, Pham B, Brehaut J, Tetroe J, Cappelli M, Hopewell S, Lavis JN, Berlin JA, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

PMID:
19162440
5.

Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.

Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C.

Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):427-37.

PMID:
16549855
6.

Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Pham B, Brehaut J, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):380-386.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.008. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128940
7.

Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.

van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):838-844.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128939
8.

Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.

Reeves BC, van Binsbergen J, van Weel C.

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1:S155-61.

PMID:
16052184
9.

[Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].

Grootens KP, Assendelft WJ, Overbeke AJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Nov 8;147(45):2226-30. Dutch.

PMID:
14640061
11.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

12.
13.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments.

Korevaar DA, Hooft L, ter Riet G.

Lab Anim. 2011 Oct;45(4):225-30. doi: 10.1258/la.2011.010121. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

PMID:
21737463
14.

Conducting systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine: common pitfalls.

Wider B, Boddy K.

Eval Health Prof. 2009 Dec;32(4):417-30. doi: 10.1177/0163278709346818.

PMID:
19942632
15.

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG.

PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78.

16.

[Systematic reviews in practice. VIII. Searching and assessing systematic reviews].

Assendelft WJ, Scholten RJ, Hoving JL, Offringa M, Bouter LM.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Aug 25;145(34):1625-31. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
11552363
17.

Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.

Needleman I, Moles DR, Worthington H.

Periodontol 2000. 2005;37:12-28. No abstract available.

PMID:
15655022
18.

Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: challenges in methodology and reporting.

Major MP, Warren S, Flores-Mir C.

J Dent Educ. 2009 Apr;73(4):471-82.

19.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
20.

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.

Finckh A, Tramèr MR.

Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732. Review.

PMID:
18227829

Supplemental Content

Support Center