Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 316

1.

Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.

Percival SL, Bowler P, Woods EJ.

Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):52-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00350.x.

PMID:
18211579
2.

Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bactericidal activity within hydrating Hydrofiber wound dressings.

Newman GR, Walker M, Hobot JA, Bowler PG.

Biomaterials. 2006 Mar;27(7):1129-39. Epub 2005 Aug 24.

PMID:
16120458
3.
4.

The antimicrobial efficacy of a silver alginate dressing against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant wound isolates.

Percival SL, Slone W, Linton S, Okel T, Corum L, Thomas JG.

Int Wound J. 2011 Jun;8(3):237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00774.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

PMID:
21470369
5.

An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.

Hill KE, Malic S, McKee R, Rennison T, Harding KG, Williams DW, Thomas DW.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Jun;65(6):1195-206. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq105. Epub 2010 Apr 8.

PMID:
20378671
6.

The visualisation and speed of kill of wound isolates on a silver alginate dressing.

Hooper SJ, Percival SL, Hill KE, Thomas DW, Hayes AJ, Williams DW.

Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9(6):633-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00927.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

PMID:
22405034
7.

Anti-biofilm efficacy of a lactoferrin/xylitol wound hydrogel used in combination with silver wound dressings.

Ammons MC, Ward LS, James GA.

Int Wound J. 2011 Jun;8(3):268-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00781.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

PMID:
21457463
8.

Controlling methicillin resistant Staphyloccocus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections with a novel biomaterial.

Martineau L, Davis SC, Peng HT, Hung A.

J Invest Surg. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):217-27. Erratum in: J Invest Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6):375. Peng, Henry T [added]; Hung, Andy [added].

PMID:
17710602
9.

Impact of silver-containing wound dressings on bacterial biofilm viability and susceptibility to antibiotics during prolonged treatment.

Kostenko V, Lyczak J, Turner K, Martinuzzi RJ.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Dec;54(12):5120-31. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00825-10. Epub 2010 Sep 20.

10.

Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.

Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A, James G, Stewart P.

J Wound Care. 2010 Jun;19(6):220-6.

11.

A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.

Thorn RM, Greenman J.

J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Dec 1;107(6):2070-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04398.x. Epub 2009 May 22.

12.

The effect of topical negative pressure on wound biofilms using an in vitro wound model.

Ngo QD, Vickery K, Deva AK.

Wound Repair Regen. 2012 Jan-Feb;20(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00747.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.

PMID:
22126340
13.

A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.

Tran PL, Hamood AN, de Souza A, Schultz G, Liesenfeld B, Mehta D, Reid TW.

Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12244. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

PMID:
25469865
14.

Combinatorial activities of ionic silver and sodium hexametaphosphate against microorganisms associated with chronic wounds.

Humphreys G, Lee GL, Percival SL, McBain AJ.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Nov;66(11):2556-61. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr350. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

PMID:
21873289
15.

Microbial inactivation properties of a new antimicrobial/antithrombotic catheter lock solution (citrate/methylene blue/parabens).

Steczko J, Ash SR, Nivens DE, Brewer L, Winger RK.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jun;24(6):1937-45. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn776. Epub 2009 Jan 30.

16.

Antimicrobial efficacy of the silver wound dressing Biatain Ag in a disc carrier test simulating wound secretion.

Ebert M, Assadian O, Hübner NO, Koburger T, Kramer A; International Society of Chemotherapy Working Group Antiseptics; Working Section for Clinical Antiseptic of the German Society for Hospital Hygiene.

Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(6):337-41. doi: 10.1159/000330761. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

PMID:
21832866
17.

Effect of a solution containing citrate/Methylene Blue/parabens on Staphylococcus aureus bacteria and biofilm, and comparison with various heparin solutions.

Sauer K, Steczko J, Ash SR.

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 May;63(5):937-45. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp060. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

PMID:
19282330
18.

Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Kristiansen S, Phipps R, Nielsen AK, Jensen PØ, Høiby N, Givskov M.

APMIS. 2007 Aug;115(8):921-8.

PMID:
17696948
19.

Effect of electrical current on the activities of antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

del Pozo JL, Rouse MS, Mandrekar JN, Sampedro MF, Steckelberg JM, Patel R.

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jan;53(1):35-40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00237-08. Epub 2008 Aug 25.

20.

Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Percival SL, Slone W, Linton S, Okel T, Corum L, Thomas JG.

Wound Repair Regen. 2011 May-Jun;19(3):436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00685.x. Epub 2011 Apr 21.

PMID:
21518089

Supplemental Content

Support Center