Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 282

1.

A comparison of the CATHIA-T sampler, the GK2.69 cyclone and the standard cowled sampler for thoracic fiber concentrations at a Taconite (iron ore)-processing mill.

Lee EG, Harper M, Nelson J, Hintz PJ, Andrew ME.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Jan;52(1):55-62. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mem062.

PMID:
18195326
2.

Field performance of the CATHIA-T sampler and two cyclones against the standard Cowled sampler for thoracic fiber concentrations.

Lee EG, Nelson J, Hintz PJ, Joy G, Andrew ME, Harper M.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Jul;54(5):545-56. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq019.

PMID:
20457784
3.

Thoracic size-selective sampling of fibres: performance of four types of thoracic sampler in laboratory tests.

Jones AD, Aitken RJ, Fabriès JF, Kauffer E, Liden G, Maynard A, Riediger G, Sahle W.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Aug;49(6):481-92.

PMID:
15790615
4.
5.

Comparison of mounting methods for the evaluation of fibers by phase contrast microscopy.

Lee EG, Pang TW, Nelson J, Andrew M, Harper M.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jul;55(6):644-57. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer015.

PMID:
21642614
6.
7.

A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.

Davies HW, Teschke K, Demers PA.

Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Aug;43(6):381-92.

PMID:
10518464
9.

A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis of air filter samples from a scrap lead smelting operation.

Harper M, Hallmark TS, Andrew ME, Bird AJ.

J Environ Monit. 2004 Oct;6(10):819-26.

PMID:
15480496
10.

Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.

Kenny LC, Bowry A, Crook B, Stancliffe JD.

Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Aug;43(6):393-404.

PMID:
10518465
11.

Personal thoracic CIP10-T sampler and its static version CATHIA-T.

Fabriès JF, Görner P, Kauffer E, Wrobel R, Vigneron JC.

Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Oct;42(7):453-65.

PMID:
9793476
12.

Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.

Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Jun;48(4):351-68.

PMID:
15191944
13.
14.

Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.

Madsen AM, Sharma AK.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Apr;52(3):167-76. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men004.

15.

Calibration of high flow rate thoracic-size selective samplers.

Lee T, Thorpe A, Cauda E, Harper M.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(6):D93-8. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1153804.

16.

Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.

Linnainmaa M, Laitinen J, Leskinen A, Sippula O, Kalliokoski P.

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Jan;5(1):28-35.

PMID:
18041642
17.

Application of PUF foam inserts for respirable dust measurements in the brick-manufacturing industry.

De Vocht F, Hirst A, Gardner A.

Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Jan;53(1):19-25. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men068.

PMID:
18977848
18.

Evaluation of a personal and microenvironmental aerosol speciation sampler (PMASS).

Geyh AS, Hering S, Kreisberg N, John W.

Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2004 Nov;(122):1-22; discussion 23-9.

PMID:
15675716
19.
20.

A comparison of four gravimetric fine particle sampling methods.

Yanosky JD, MacIntosh DL.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Jun;51(6):878-84.

PMID:
11417679
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center