Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 80

1.

External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).

Shea BJ, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM.

PLoS One. 2007 Dec 26;2(12):e1350.

2.

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Feb 20.

PMID:
19230606
3.

[Assessment of reliability and validity of assessment of multiple systematic reviews in Chinese systematic reviews on stomatology].

Su N, Lü J, Li C, Chen L, Shi Z.

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Feb;31(1):49-52. Chinese.

4.

A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR.

Schmitter M, Sterzenbach G, Faggion CM Jr, Krastl G.

Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jun;17(5):1287-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0945-z. Epub 2013 Feb 23. Review.

PMID:
23436119
5.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers.

Seo HJ, Kim KU.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 28;12:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-129.

6.

Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties.

Pieper D, Buechter RB, Li L, Prediger B, Eikermann M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Review.

PMID:
25638457
7.

Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews.

Kang D, Wu Y, Hu D, Hong Q, Wang J, Zhang X.

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:732195. doi: 10.1155/2012/732195. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

8.

The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.

Faggion CM Jr, Listl S, Giannakopoulos NN.

Vet J. 2012 May;192(2):140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Sep 15. Review.

PMID:
21924652
9.

Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers.

Pieper D, Jacobs A, Weikert B, Fishta A, Wegewitz U.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0380-y.

10.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews of health care interventions using AMSTAR.

Jagannath V, Mathew JL, Asokan GV, Fedorowicz Z.

Indian Pediatr. 2011 May;48(5):383-5. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

PMID:
21169651
11.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.

Remschmidt C, Wichmann O, Harder T.

Vaccine. 2014 Mar 26;32(15):1678-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.060. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

PMID:
24513008
12.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.

Elangovan S, Avila-Ortiz G, Johnson GK, Karimbux N, Allareddy V.

J Periodontol. 2013 Feb;84(2):176-85. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120021. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Review.

PMID:
22509753
13.

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches.

Popovich I, Windsor B, Jordan V, Showell M, Shea B, Farquhar CM.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050403. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

14.

Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers.

Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP, Vandermeer B, Ansari M, Tsertsvadze A, Dryden DM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):982-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 16.

PMID:
23683848
15.

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.

Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Hartling L.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0325-5.

16.

La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).

Brosseau L, Laroche C, Guitard P, King J, Poitras S, Casimiro L, Barette JA, Cardinal D, Cavallo S, Laferrière L, Martini R, Champoux N, Taverne J, Paquette C, Tremblay S, Sutton A, Galipeau R, Tourigny J, Toupin-April K, Loew L, Demers C, Sauvé-Schenk K, Paquet N, Savard J, Lagacé J, Pharand D, Vaillancourt V.

Physiother Can. 2017;69(1):20-29. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-80F. French.

PMID:
28154441
17.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.

Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A.

J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Feb 21. Review.

PMID:
20307731
18.

Can AMSTAR also be applied to systematic reviews of non-randomized studies?

Pieper D, Mathes T, Eikermann M.

BMC Res Notes. 2014 Sep 6;7:609. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-609.

19.
20.

The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity.

Bühn S, Mathes T, Prengel P, Wegewitz U, Ostermann T, Robens S, Pieper D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 8. pii: S0895-4356(16)30672-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.019. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28694122

Supplemental Content

Support Center