Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 276

1.

Scheduling mammography screening for the early detection of breast cancer in Korean women.

Lee SY, Jeong SH, Kim J, Jung SH, Song KB, Nam CM.

J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):205-9.

PMID:
18078566
2.

[A study on scheduling periodic examinations for the early detection of breast cancer in Korea].

Jeong SH, Kang DR, Hur NW, Kim J, Lee SY, Jung SH, Nam CM.

J Prev Med Public Health. 2006 Jul;39(4):346-52. Korean.

3.

Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.

Wong IO, Kuntz KM, Cowling BJ, Lam CL, Leung GM.

Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):885-95. Erratum in: Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):540.

4.

Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results.

Weedon-Fekjaer H, Vatten LJ, Aalen OO, Lindqvist B, Tretli S.

J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):172-8.

PMID:
16417693
5.

Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.

Taylor R, Page A, Bampton D, Estoesta J, Rickard M.

J Med Screen. 2004;11(4):199-206.

PMID:
15563775
6.

Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: a comparison of different methods.

Brekelmans CT, Westers P, Faber JA, Peeters PH, Collette HJ.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):68-71.

7.

Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.

Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn292. Epub 2008 Sep 9.

PMID:
18780864
8.

Mammography screening and increased incidence of breast cancer in Wisconsin.

Lantz PM, Remington PL, Newcomb PA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Nov 6;83(21):1540-6.

PMID:
1960750
9.
10.

Cost-effective mammography screening in Korea: high incidence of breast cancer in young women.

Lee SY, Jeong SH, Kim YN, Kim J, Kang DR, Kim HC, Nam CM.

Cancer Sci. 2009 Jun;100(6):1105-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01147.x. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

11.

Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden.

Bordás P, Jonsson H, Nyström L, Lenner P.

J Med Screen. 2009;16(1):39-45. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.008098.

PMID:
19349530
12.

Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.

Wu JC, Hakama M, Anttila A, Yen AM, Malila N, Sarkeala T, Auvinen A, Chiu SY, Chen HH.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jul;122(2):553-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0701-x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

PMID:
20054645
13.

A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Shen Y, Parmigiani G.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Feb;14(2):529-32.

14.

Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.

Warmerdam PG, de Koning HJ, Boer R, Beemsterboer PM, Dierks ML, Swart E, Robra BP.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Apr;51(2):180-6.

15.

Dissemination of periodic mammography and patterns of use, by birth cohort, in Catalonia (Spain).

Rue M, Carles M, Vilaprinyo E, Martinez-Alonso M, Espinas JA, Pla R, Brugulat P.

BMC Cancer. 2008 Nov 17;8:336. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-336.

16.

A longer breast carcinoma screening interval for women age older than 65 years?

Boer R, de Koning HJ, van der Maas PJ.

Cancer. 1999 Oct 15;86(8):1506-10.

PMID:
10526279
17.

Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg R, Rutter CM, Geller BM, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Dignan M, Cutter G, Ballard-Barbash R.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 6;138(9):771.

PMID:
12558355
18.

[Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].

Urbschat I, Kieschke J, Schlanstedt-Jahn U, von Gehlen S, Thiel A, Jensch P.

Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Jul;67(7):448-54. German.

PMID:
16103967
19.

Mammography screening and the increase in breast cancer incidence in Hawaii.

Maskarinec G, Wilkens L, Meng L.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Mar;6(3):201-8.

20.

Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry.

Suzuki A, Kuriyama S, Kawai M, Amari M, Takeda M, Ishida T, Ohnuki K, Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Shibuya D, Ohuchi N.

Cancer Sci. 2008 Nov;99(11):2264-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00926.x. Epub 2008 Sep 15.

Supplemental Content

Support Center