Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 78

1.

Assessing glucose monitor performance--a standardized approach.

Mahoney JJ, Ellison JM.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Dec;9(6):545-52.

PMID:
18034609
2.

Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports.

Mahoney J, Ellison J.

Clin Chem. 2007 Jun;53(6):1122-8. Epub 2007 May 3. Review.

3.

Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.

Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Rutschmann M, Haug C, Heinemann L.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):885-94. doi: 10.1177/1932296815580160. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Review.

4.

New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting, October 28, 2011.

Walsh J, Roberts R, Vigersky RA, Schwartz F.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 1;6(2):466-74.

5.

A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance.

Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan 1;4(1):75-83. Review.

6.

Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.

Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):113-22. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0208. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

PMID:
24205978
7.

Assessing the quality of Bionime self-monitoring blood glucose system Rightest GM110: a critical evaluation of interference and ambient circumstances.

Hsu CT, Hsiao HC, Lee MS, Chang SF, Lee TC, Tsai YS, Zen JM.

Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Apr;402(1-2):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.12.029. Epub 2009 Jan 5.

PMID:
19166825
8.

Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.

Klonoff DC, Prahalad P.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):895-910. doi: 10.1177/1932296815584797. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Review.

9.

Re-evaluating a standard approach to assessing glucose monitor performance.

Baum JM, Pardo SA, Schachner HC, Parkes JL, Simmons DA.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 May;11(5):323-5; author reply 327. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0084. No abstract available.

PMID:
19425880
10.

Portable blood glucose monitors.

[No authors listed]

Health Devices. 1994 Mar;23(3):64-97. No abstract available.

PMID:
8200809
11.

Assessing the quality of publications evaluating the accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems.

Thorpe GH.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):253-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0265. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Review.

12.

[Analytical performance evaluation of glucose monitoring system following ISO15197].

An D, Chung HJ, Lee HW, Lee W, Chun S, Min WK.

Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Oct;29(5):423-9. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.423. Korean.

13.

Evaluation of four portable self-monitoring blood glucose meters.

Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC, Negri M, Rizzotti P.

Ann Clin Biochem. 2006 Sep;43(Pt 5):408-13.

PMID:
17022884
14.

Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bouter LM, de Vet HC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12.

15.

Assessing glucose meter accuracy.

Arabadjief D, Nichols JH.

Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Nov;22(11):2167-74. Review.

PMID:
17076977
16.

Glucometers: accuracy and precision, Part II. Selection of a blood glucose monitor for standard hospital use.

Considine JM, Law T.

J Pediatr Nurs. 1993 Jun;8(3):193-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
8340886
17.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905
18.

[Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].

Rossi P.

Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):145-9. Review. Italian.

PMID:
15305705
19.

Accuracy assessment of two novel systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197:2013.

Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, Baumstark A, Haug C, Stolberg E, Freckmann G.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):906-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296814536030. Epub 2014 May 25. No abstract available.

20.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; STARD Group.

Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):4-10.

PMID:
14760036

Supplemental Content

Support Center