Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

Analysis of molecular inversion probe performance for allele copy number determination.

Wang Y, Moorhead M, Karlin-Neumann G, Wang NJ, Ireland J, Lin S, Chen C, Heiser LM, Chin K, Esserman L, Gray JW, Spellman PT, Faham M.

Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R246.

2.

Genome wide DNA copy number analysis in cholangiocarcinoma using high resolution molecular inversion probe single nucleotide polymorphism assay.

Arnold A, Bahra M, Lenze D, Bradtmöller M, Guse K, Gehlhaar C, Bläker H, Heppner FL, Koch A.

Exp Mol Pathol. 2015 Oct;99(2):344-53. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

PMID:
26260902
3.

Allele quantification using molecular inversion probes (MIP).

Wang Y, Moorhead M, Karlin-Neumann G, Falkowski M, Chen C, Siddiqui F, Davis RW, Willis TD, Faham M.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Nov 28;33(21):e183.

4.

Molecular inversion probe assay for allelic quantitation.

Ji H, Welch K.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;556:67-87. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-192-9_6.

5.

Retrospective analysis of FFPE based Wilms' Tumor samples through copy number and somatic mutation related Molecular Inversion Probe Based Array.

Singh N, Sahu DK, Goel M, Kant R, Gupta DK.

Gene. 2015 Jul 10;565(2):295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.051. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

PMID:
25913740
6.

Molecular inversion probes reveal patterns of 9p21 deletion and copy number aberrations in childhood leukemia.

Schiffman JD, Wang Y, McPherson LA, Welch K, Zhang N, Davis R, Lacayo NJ, Dahl GV, Faham M, Ford JM, Ji HP.

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009 Aug;193(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.03.005.

7.

Genome-wide allelic state analysis on flow-sorted tumor fractions provides an accurate measure of chromosomal aberrations.

Corver WE, Middeldorp A, ter Haar NT, Jordanova ES, van Puijenbroek M, van Eijk R, Cornelisse CJ, Fleuren GJ, Morreau H, Oosting J, van Wezel T.

Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 15;68(24):10333-40. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2665.

8.

Determination of genomic copy number with quantitative microsphere hybridization.

Newkirk HL, Rogan PK, Miralles M, Knoll JH.

Hum Mutat. 2006 Apr;27(4):376-86. Erratum in: Hum Mutat. 2006 Jun;27(6):597.

PMID:
16541397
9.

Molecular inversion probe assay.

Absalan F, Ronaghi M.

Methods Mol Biol. 2007;396:315-30.

PMID:
18025701
10.

Whole genome DNA copy number changes identified by high density oligonucleotide arrays.

Huang J, Wei W, Zhang J, Liu G, Bignell GR, Stratton MR, Futreal PA, Wooster R, Jones KW, Shapero MH.

Hum Genomics. 2004 May;1(4):287-99.

11.

Probe-free allele-specific copy number detection and analysis of tumors.

Zhu A, Guan X, Gu X, Xie G.

Anal Biochem. 2016 Mar 15;497:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

PMID:
26743720
12.

The loss-of-allele assay for ES cell screening and mouse genotyping.

Frendewey D, Chernomorsky R, Esau L, Om J, Xue Y, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Valenzuela DM.

Methods Enzymol. 2010;476:295-307. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)76017-1.

PMID:
20691873
13.

Performance comparison of Affymetrix SNP6.0 and cytogenetic 2.7M whole-genome microarrays in complex cancer samples.

Bødker JS, Gyrup C, Johansen P, Schmitz A, Madsen J, Johnsen HE, Bøgsted M, Dybkær K, Nyegaard M.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;139(2):80-7. doi: 10.1159/000345125. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

PMID:
23182917
14.

Combined genome-wide allelotyping and copy number analysis identify frequent genetic losses without copy number reduction in medulloblastoma.

Langdon JA, Lamont JM, Scott DK, Dyer S, Prebble E, Bown N, Grundy RG, Ellison DW, Clifford SC.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006 Jan;45(1):47-60.

PMID:
16149064
15.

Effects of DNA mass on multiple displacement whole genome amplification and genotyping performance.

Bergen AW, Qi Y, Haque KA, Welch RA, Chanock SJ.

BMC Biotechnol. 2005 Sep 16;5:24.

16.

Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Tsubosa Y, Sugihara H, Mukaisho K, Kamitani S, Peng DF, Ling ZQ, Tani T, Hattori T.

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005 Apr 15;158(2):156-66.

PMID:
15796963
17.

Sensitive quantification of somatic mutations using molecular inversion probes.

Hirani R, Connolly AR, Putral L, Dobrovic A, Trau M.

Anal Chem. 2011 Nov 1;83(21):8215-21. doi: 10.1021/ac2019409. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

PMID:
21942816
18.

Molecular inversion probe analysis of gene copy alterations reveals distinct categories of colorectal carcinoma.

Ji H, Kumm J, Zhang M, Farnam K, Salari K, Faham M, Ford JM, Davis RW.

Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 15;66(16):7910-9.

19.

Molecular inversion probes: a novel microarray technology and its application in cancer research.

Wang Y, Cottman M, Schiffman JD.

Cancer Genet. 2012 Jul-Aug;205(7-8):341-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.06.005. Review.

PMID:
22867995
20.

Density matters: comparison of array platforms for detection of copy-number variation and copy-neutral abnormalities.

Mason-Suares H, Kim W, Grimmett L, Williams ES, Horner VL, Kunig D, Goldlust IS, Wu BL, Shen Y, Miller DT, Martin CL, Rudd MK.

Genet Med. 2013 Sep;15(9):706-12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.36. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

PMID:
23558256

Supplemental Content

Support Center