Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 179

1.

Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.

Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, Magloire LK, Pettker CM, Abdel-Razeq SS, Rosenberg VA, Buhimschi IA, Buhimschi CS.

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):808-13.

PMID:
17906013
2.

Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.

Ceci O, Scioscia M, Bettocchi S, Cantatore C, Nardelli C, Laera A, Vimercati A.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c90b. No abstract available.

PMID:
18238987
3.

Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery.

Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;125(3):219-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

PMID:
24680843
4.

Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.

Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

PMID:
26522861
5.

Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Review.

PMID:
24912096
6.

Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.

Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):525-32. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318209abf0.

PMID:
21343754
7.

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.

Bamberg C, Dudenhausen JW, Bujak V, Rodekamp E, Brauer M, Hinkson L, Kalache K, Henrich W.

Ultraschall Med. 2016 Sep 14. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27626240
8.

Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.

Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N.

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Sep;21(9):522-6. doi: 09.2011/JCPSP.522526.

PMID:
21914406
9.

[Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].

Zimmer M, Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Tomiałowicz M, Michniewicz J, Wiatrowski A, Mikołajczyk K.

Ginekol Pol. 2007 Nov;78(11):842-6. Polish.

PMID:
18306913
10.

Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.

Brahmalakshmy BL, Kushtagi P.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):755-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3455-6. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

PMID:
25209351
11.

Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure.

Kataoka S, Tanuma F, Iwaki Y, Iwaki K, Fujii T, Fujimoto T.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Dec;95(12):1352-1358. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13015. Epub 2016 Oct 9.

PMID:
27617416
12.

Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture.

Ceci O, Cantatore C, Scioscia M, Nardelli C, Ravi M, Vimercati A, Bettocchi S.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012 Nov;38(11):1302-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01872.x. Epub 2012 May 21.

PMID:
22612785
13.

Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.

Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, Zimmer M.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:141-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

PMID:
27591715
14.

Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.

Basic E, Basic-Cetkovic V, Kozaric H, Rama A.

Med Arch. 2012;66(3 Suppl 1):41-4.

PMID:
22937691
15.

Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.

Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N, Dueholm M.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):207-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.12376.

16.

Uterine scar assessment: how should it be done before trial of labor after cesarean delivery?

Spong CY, Queenan JT.

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):521-2. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ce593. No abstract available.

PMID:
21343752
17.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic removal of cesarean scar ectopic and hysterotomy revision.

Siedhoff MT, Schiff LD, Moulder JK, Toubia T, Ivester T.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):681.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

PMID:
25499261
18.

Purse-string double-layer closure: a novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section.

Turan C, Büyükbayrak EE, Yilmaz AO, Karsidag YK, Pirimoglu M.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/jog.12593. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

PMID:
25370526
19.
20.

Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial.

Bennich G, Rudnicki M, Wilken-Jensen C, Lousen T, Lassen PD, Wøjdemann K.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):417-22. doi: 10.1002/uog.15792.

Supplemental Content

Support Center