Similar articles for PMID: 17898620

Year	Number of Results
1994	2
1995	1
1996	1
1997	3
1998	5
1999	2
2000	4
2001	2
2002	3
2003	3
2004	2
2005	2
2006	5
2007	5
2008	2
2009	3
2010	1
2011	4
2012	9
2013	14
2014	7
2015	5
2016	8
2017	4
2018	6
2019	8
2020	1
2021	4
2022	3
2023	2
2024	0

1

Magnetic resonance imaging and explantation investigation of long-term silicone gel implant integrity.

Collis N, Litherland J, Enion D, Sharpe DT. Collis N, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct;120(5):1401-1406. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279374.99503.89. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID: 17898620

2

Magnetic resonance imaging screening results compared with explantation results in poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.

Maijers MC, Niessen FB, Veldhuizen JFH, Ritt MJPF, Manoliu RA. Maijers MC, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):114e-120e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436853.32527.c3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014. PMID: 24469182

3

Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danish women.

Hölmich LR, Kjøller K, Vejborg I, Conrad C, Sletting S, McLaughlin JK, Fryzek J, Breiting V, Jørgensen A, Olsen JH. Hölmich LR, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep 15;108(4):848-58; discussion 859-63. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200109150-00006. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. PMID: 11547138

4

High-resolution ultrasound in the detection of silicone gel breast implant shell failure: background, in vitro studies, and early clinical results.

Bengtson BP, Eaves FF 3rd. Bengtson BP, et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Feb;32(2):157-74. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11434507. Aesthet Surg J. 2012. PMID: 22328687

5

Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama.

Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, Soo MS, Pennello G. Brown SL, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Oct;175(4):1057-64. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751057. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 11000165

6

Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.

Stevens WG, Pacella SJ, Gear AJ, Freeman ME, McWhorter C, Tenenbaum MJ, Stoker DA. Stevens WG, et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.09.008. Aesthet Surg J. 2008. PMID: 19083592

7

An analysis of silicone gel-filled breast implants: diagnosis and failure rates.

Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr, Beran SJ, Rathakrishnan R, Griffin J, Robinson JB Jr, Kenkel JM. Rohrich RJ, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Dec;102(7):2304-8; discussion 2309. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199812000-00004. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998. PMID: 9858163

8

The Value of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Integrity of Silicone Breast Implants.

Rukanskienė D, Bytautaitė G, Česnauskaitė A, Pilipaitytė L, Aštrauskas T, Jonaitienė E. Rukanskienė D, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 3;57(5):440. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050440. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34063687 Free PMC article.

9

Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.

Doren EL, Pierpont YN, Shivers SC, Berger LH. Doren EL, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):957-966. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 26505700

10

Sub-muscular plane for augmentation mammoplasty patients increases silicone gel implant rupture rate.

Hadad E, Klein D, Seligman Y, Wiser I, Heller L. Hadad E, et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Mar;72(3):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019. PMID: 30616906

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

115 results

Results by year