Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 2830

2.

Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.

Etemadi A, Raiszadeh F, Alaeddini F, Azizi F.

Saudi Med J. 2004 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S29-33.

PMID:
14968189
3.
4.
5.

Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.

Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, Robinson A, Rowlands I.

J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.

PMID:
19482976
6.

[The impact factor and editorial decisions].

Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R.

Neurologia. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(6):342-8. Spanish.

PMID:
18597189
7.
8.

A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.

Earnshaw JJ, Farndon JR, Guillou PJ, Johnson CD, Murie JA, Murray GD.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Apr;82(4 Suppl):133-5.

PMID:
10889776
9.

What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.

Gupta P, Kaur G, Sharma B, Shah D, Choudhury P.

Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jun;43(6):479-89. Erratum in: Indian Pediatr. 2006 Aug;43(8):749.

10.

How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication.

Williams HC.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Jul;51(1):79-83.

PMID:
15243528
11.

The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication.

Radford DR, Smillie L, Wilson RF, Grace AM.

Br Dent J. 1999 Oct 9;187(7):376-9.

PMID:
10581814
12.

Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.

Johnston SC, Lowenstein DH, Ferriero DM, Messing RO, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL.

Ann Neurol. 2007 Apr;61(4):A10-2.

PMID:
17444512
13.

[How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].

Eklund J.

Lakartidningen. 2004 Dec 23;101(51-52):4250. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
15658596
14.

[Improving the editing of medical journals and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)].

Reyes H, Kauffmann R, Andresen M.

Rev Med Chil. 1997 Nov;125(11):1289-91. Spanish.

PMID:
9609048
15.

Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.

Harris AH, Reeder R, Hyun JK.

J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Oct;43(15):1231-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 10.

PMID:
19435635
16.

How to write an oncology manuscript.

Gaafar R.

J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2005 Sep;17(3):132-8.

17.

Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.

Landy DC, Coverdale JH, McCullough LB, Sharp RR.

Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):495-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8bf4.

PMID:
19318788
18.

Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?

Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD.

JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):139-42.

PMID:
8015126
19.

Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.

Luty J, Arokiadass SM, Easow JM, Anapreddy JR.

J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):200-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.026740.

PMID:
19251974
20.

[Report of the editors, 2010].

García Puig J, Alonso-Vega GG, Blanco JJ.

Rev Clin Esp. 2011 Jan;211(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Jan 8. Spanish.

PMID:
21216398

Supplemental Content

Support Center